Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-03-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 01-03-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 9:22:30 AM
Creation date
3/10/2017 8:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/3/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
...-.---.... <br /> T <br /> FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: Z 5__88 S'T'ARPOINT PARTNERS <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIAL SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 _ Sp C� IFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 2 _ SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALU�TIONLRE20NING "Yes" indicates compliance:- "No" indicates BoOA-coOFliance <br /> PLANNING COMMISSIONERS <br /> BOARD <br /> RECOMMENDED <br /> ' FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS <br /> Ordjnance Requirements <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements <br /> specified in Article 20 - <br /> AMgA_0ments. Those <br /> requirements include: <br /> Yes <br /> 20,32 a) Map showing affected x_Y No <br /> es No Site glen provided at scale of 1"=5 0' <br /> property at scale of not less <br /> than 1`=100" nor more than <br /> 1"=20' <br /> Yes No <br /> 20.3.2 b} Legal description <br /> x_Yes No Description provided with application <br /> of property <br /> No The applicant claims that an error was Yes No <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of be _x—yes made when the Joint Planning Area and <br /> alleged error, if any, Land Use Plan was adopted in October, <br /> corrected by proposed amendment 1986. At that time, the activity node <br /> at Starpoint was removed, but the <br /> property remained zoned CC-3 instead of <br /> being rezoned to EC-5. <br /> N <br /> V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.