Orange County NC Website
11 <br /> • Town of Chapel Hill staff determining process/date to inform Town Council <br /> • If jurisdictions wish to proceed, earliest joint public hearing date would be October 26, <br /> 2017 <br /> • Normal process mandated by State statutes would be required for Towns to extend <br /> ETJs <br /> • Questions and feedback for staff by BOCC <br /> Commissioner Price asked if the Town of Carrboro had this report on their consent <br /> agenda. <br /> Perdita Holtz said the Aldermen received the information and asked questions. <br /> Commissioner Price clarified that the Alderman just received the information and made <br /> no decisions. <br /> Perdita Holtz said yes, the Board of Alderman just received the information. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if clarification could be provided regarding potential <br /> complications with the fire zone in the southern portion of the map. <br /> Commissioner McKee said with these maps, it is unclear whether changing the zoning <br /> will remove water from the fire zones. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if this area of the map is solely residential. <br /> Perdita Holtz said mostly residential. <br /> Commissioner Rich said Chatham County is building right up to this area. She said this <br /> is a triangle of land that seems to be hanging out there, and she does not understand why it <br /> became the rural buffer. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said he totally agreed with Commissioner Rich, and asked if <br /> there is value in the triangle of the rural buffer. He said it is a unique land section, different from <br /> the rest of the rural buffer, and he would like to know more about it. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said people in Chapel Hill wanted to preserve open spaces, and <br /> this piece of land may have served that purpose in anticipation of greater development. <br /> Chair Dorosin asked if staff could follow up on all these questions. <br /> Commissioner Rich clarified that it would be helpful to know the Town of Carrboro's land <br /> use plan for the aforementioned areas. <br /> 2. Introduction to Potential Amendments to the Water and Sewer Management, Planning, <br /> and Boundary Agreement—To receive a presentation on possible amendments to the <br /> Water and Sewer Management, Planning, and Boundary Agreement. <br /> BACKGROUND: Planning staffs of the three local government jurisdictions that are party to the <br /> "Joint Planning Agreement," as it is commonly called, have been discussing possible <br /> amendments to the Land Use Plan to better align with various local government goals and <br /> policies (this is a separate agenda item) and accompanying modifications to the Water and <br /> Sewer Management, Planning, and Boundary Agreement (WASMPBA) map. Additionally, <br /> during discussions regarding the Hillsborough Economic Development District (EDD) that <br /> occurred in the fall of 2016, it was mentioned that it could be advantageous to the EDD to <br /> designate additional WASMPBA primary service area immediately south of the EDD to the <br /> Rural Buffer boundary. <br /> These potential amendments would change the designation from `long term interest area' to <br /> `primary service area' which would permit development in the short term. <br /> Also in the fall of 2016, OWASA and Town of Carrboro staff broached the potential idea of <br /> designating additional "primary service area" adjacent to Smith Level Road. The area is zoned <br /> R-10 (Residential, 10,000 square feet per dwelling unit) which is extremely small if onsite well <br />