Orange County NC Website
12 <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he agreed with Commissioner Rich, and the object is to <br /> serve those who are living and working in Orange County. <br /> Commissioner Price said she could see both sides, and the community organizations <br /> know the locals and can connect the neediest to the available housing. <br /> Commissioner McKee said leaving the wording in aligns with the County's value of <br /> local. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said if there is a mission statement, the Board can use that to <br /> articulate that the Board's goal, to the greatest extent possible, is to serve those who live and <br /> work in Orange County. <br /> Travis Myren said staff can include a policy statement, of that nature, in the RFP <br /> documents, noting that first priority will be given to those who live and work in Orange County. <br /> Commissioner McKee made an amendment that if this motion passes, staff should be <br /> directed to add this proposed language from Commissioner Jacobs into a policy statement. <br /> Commissioner Burroughs and Commissioner Price agreed. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Burroughs to <br /> adopt the resolution declaring eight (8) County owned parcels surplus land for the purposes of <br /> affordable housing development in Attachment 5 and authorized the Chair to sign the <br /> resolution. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Rich to <br /> approve the schedule for release of Affordable Housing RFP's for use of$2.5 million in bond <br /> funds and eight (8) County-owned parcels for affordable housing development in Attachment 6 <br /> with the amended language (below) <br /> Commissioner Price said to add, "on or before June 6th" to "BOCC consider approval of <br /> recommendations". <br /> Commissioner McKee said he would accept the amendment. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if that would give everyone a fair opportunity. <br /> Chair Dorosin said all items would still be due no later than June 6th, but if reviews can <br /> be completed before that date, then the Board should do so. <br /> Commissioner Rich agreed. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if an application submission could be defined. <br /> Travis Myren said the application submission would solicit information that corresponds <br /> to the scoring criteria. He said design plans and architectural drawings would not be due at <br /> that time. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if it would be possible to score a project without the <br /> design of the project. <br /> Travis Myren said the scoring criteria addresses the more qualitative aspects of the <br /> project. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said the application submission is more subjective. <br /> Travis Myren said there are some elements in the scoring criteria that address building <br /> design, so some information will be needed; but final building documents would not be <br /> needed. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said there will be some binding nature to these applications. <br />