Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-07-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 03-07-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-07-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2017 11:42:20 AM
Creation date
3/3/2017 12:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/7/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-07-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> 1 said those who own their mobile homes do not receive tax notices. She said staff is looking at <br /> 2 best practices from other counties, and is working to try and find a suitable solution. <br /> 3 Chair Dorosin referred to the closure liability and the Solid Waste fund, and asked if <br /> 4 there is any requirement that these two be related. He said the amount that is in the Solid <br /> 5 Waste fund is not necessarily linked to the $6 million closure liability. <br /> 6 Bonnie Hammersley said no and there is no state mandate for what you have to have. <br /> 7 She said the $6 million liability is based on what it would take if there were a catastrophic event. <br /> 8 Chair Dorosin asked if there is another pot of money, other than the fund balance, for <br /> 9 closure liability. <br /> 10 Bonnie Hammersley said there is the $6.5 assigned within the balance sheet for that <br /> 11 purpose. She said the available fund balance is also on the balance sheet and is unassigned. <br /> 12 Chair Dorosin clarified that there is $6.5 million set aside to cover the potential closure <br /> 13 of the landfill, and if the balance fund were to be dipped into to cover this shortfall, the $6.5 <br /> 14 million would not be affected. <br /> 15 Bonnie Hammersley said that is correct, and the $6.5 million is separate from the $4.4 <br /> 16 million. <br /> 17 Chair Dorosin echoed Commissioner McKee's concern about this fee and its affect on <br /> 18 low-income residents, and he hoped to find a solution for this. He said he would like to reduce <br /> 19 the County's reliance on fees, as stated by Commissioner McKee. <br /> 20 Chair Dorosin said the Board has looked at various potential revenue sources for the <br /> 21 closed landfill, and the consensus seems to be that nothing can be done with it. He said he <br /> 22 would like to keep working on this and encouraged creativity. <br /> 23 Commissioner Rich thanked all who come to the SWAG meetings. <br /> 24 Chair Dorosin thanked Commissioner Jacobs and Commissioner Rich for their service <br /> 25 on this committee. <br /> 26 Commissioner Jacobs thanked the Manager for her work on this committee. <br /> 27 Commissioner Price asked if the way in which apartments will be affected by this fee <br /> 28 could be outlined. <br /> 29 Gayle Wilson said each apartment unit is assessed a fee, for which the owner of the <br /> 30 building is responsible to pay. <br /> 31 Commissioner Price requested that any public outreach and education on this topic <br /> 32 should include information about the tax exemption for this fee. She said many people do not <br /> 33 know about this. <br /> 34 Commissioner Marcoplos said it may be worthwhile to look at other counties that do not <br /> 35 have fees, but are still high performing. <br /> 36 Commissioner Marcoplos said landfills take about 30 years to settle. <br /> 37 Gayle Wilson said it may take longer, but federal law says 30 years post closure <br /> 38 maintenance and monitoring. <br /> 39 Commissioner Marcoplos said there is solar technology that can be overlaid on a landfill <br /> 40 prior to 30 years. <br /> 41 Gayle Wilson said this is possible depending on the degree of subsidence and settling <br /> 42 of the landfill. He said if it is stabilized enough, it is possible. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 3. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Discussion <br /> 45 <br /> 46 BACKGROUND: In 2010 and 2011 (adopted July 2011) an Alternatives Analysis (D-O AA) of <br /> 47 the Durham Orange Transit Corridor was conducted by URS (now AECOM) consultants as part <br /> 48 of the Triangle Regional Transit Program. An introductory excerpt from the 171 page study is <br /> 49 below. The link for this information is http://ourtransitfuture.com/wpcontent/ <br /> 50 uploads/2013/12/2.2.2a-00401-DO-Vol-l-Detailed-Def-July-ALL-DVD-READY.pdf. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.