Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-07-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 03-07-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-07-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2017 11:42:20 AM
Creation date
3/3/2017 12:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/7/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-07-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> 1 Enterprise Fund Deficit = $4.1 Million <br /> 2 - Current GF Contribution = $2.0 Million <br /> 3 Remaining SW Deficit = $2.1 Million <br /> 4 <br /> 5 • FY 2019-20 <br /> 6 Enterprise Fund Deficit = $4.4 Million <br /> 7 - Current GF Contribution = $2.0 Million <br /> 8 Remaining SW Deficit = $2.4 Million <br /> 9 <br /> 10 • FY 2020-21 <br /> 11 Enterprise Fund Deficit = $4.6 Million <br /> 12 - Current GF Contribution = $2.0 Million <br /> 13 Remaining SW Deficit = $2.6 Million <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Scenario 2 (chart) <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Financial Analysis Conclusions <br /> 18 • As an alternative to solely increasing the Program Fee, the County could take a multi- <br /> 19 faceted approach by increasing the General Fund Contribution, using Solid Waste Fund <br /> 20 Balance when available, and more modestly increasing the Program Fee. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Cost-of-Services Benchmarking (graph) <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if there is no fee indicated, does that mean that the <br /> 25 particular county does not charge a fee. <br /> 26 Bob Dick said yes, and he said every municipal jurisdiction gets its funding through <br /> 27 slightly different formulas. He said this chart was completed using only counties that assess a <br /> 28 Solid Waste fee. He said if a county receives funds via the county tax rate, a fee would not <br /> 29 show up in this chart. <br /> 30 Commissioner Price asked if the commissioner approved fee schedule, contained in the <br /> 31 report, is consistent with other counties. <br /> 32 Bob Dick said this is a difficult question to answer definitively as Solid Waste programs <br /> 33 tend to have all sorts of mechanisms and fees assigned. He added that throughout its review, <br /> 34 SCS Enterprises did not see any glaring inefficiencies throughout the entire department's <br /> 35 programs that would warrant a suggestion of improved efficiency. <br /> 36 Commissioner Price asked if there is any particular plan to deal with recycled materials <br /> 37 that are not purchased. <br /> 38 Gayle Wilson said all of their materials are going to market daily in Raleigh, and he said <br /> 39 the County no longer has to pay to have those materials received. He said changes are being <br /> 40 made day-to-day, and a bit of money is being made currently, with the exception of glass. <br /> 41 Commissioner Price asked if there is a way to dispose of glass without a market for it. <br /> 42 Gayle Wilson said there is a market for glass if it is given away. He said it is a difficult <br /> 43 material to run through the machinery, but once it is sorted there is a market, but it is not paid <br /> 44 for. <br /> 45 Commissioner Price said she wanted to insure that the recycling efforts are not in vain. <br /> 46 Gayle Wilson said that County agreements prevent glass from being landfilled. <br /> 47 Bob Dick resumed the PowerPoint presentation: <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Recommended Financial Plan <br /> 50 • Continue General Fund Contribution <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.