Browse
Search
Minutes 01-27-2017
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Minutes 01-27-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2017 11:17:09 AM
Creation date
2/22/2017 11:16:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/27/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> John Roberts said they are giving their employees access not serving as an internet <br /> service provider; if anyone else happens to gain access then that is OK. <br /> In reply to a question from Commissioner Burroughs, John Roberts said a School of <br /> Government professor probably would say that the County cannot pay a private internet <br /> provider a subsidy to extend service to unserved parts of the county. However, there is a way to <br /> give a grant to a service provider who builds something for the County. The County would have <br /> control over part of the access and the provider would have control over the other part. They are <br /> still looking at how to do that within the bounds of the very restrictive statute. <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said can't they simply give them a grant to extend the service. <br /> John Roberts said that may be an option. This statute is two years old and there has <br /> been no challenge to it yet. Any County can be as aggressive as it wants to be; it will take a <br /> taxpayer or private internet service provider to come forward with a lawsuit saying that the <br /> County lacks the authority or is giving unfair advantage to a competitor in order for a court to <br /> give an opinion on the limits of this statute. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said the new President and the new FCC Chair are both against <br /> net neutrality. At the same time, the new FCC Chair believes there is a digital divide in the <br /> country. Let's keep in mind the option of negotiating some kind of net neutrality in systems we <br /> subsidize. They could provide grants and make arrangements for broadband infrastructure to <br /> Cedar Grove, for example, but it might cost households in rural areas an extra $10 or more to <br /> download a PowerPoint presentation from our website because without net neutrality the <br /> provider can charge by the amount of data received on top of the monthly fee. He added that <br /> the Board should be kept apprised of changes under discussion at the federal level regarding <br /> broadband and net neutrality. He said federal policy will set the context for the State's policies. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said the General Assembly pays lip service to helping out rural <br /> areas, yet stifles progress. He asked what the status is of broadband-access policy at the State <br /> level, and whether the Association of County Commissioners has any influence on this matter. <br /> Rather than our going through contortions, they should try to get rid of this restrictive law. <br /> Commissioner Rich said she meets regularly with Travis Myren and Jim Northup to talk <br /> about broadband. She also is on the National Association of Counties Telecommunications and <br /> Technology Committee. There are federal bills under consideration now to make it harder to <br /> extend broadband to underserved communities. Maryland is the leader in resolutions on all of <br /> this and she can pass along additional information. <br /> Commissioner Rich said TJCOG brought in some people in the McCrory Administration <br /> to a conference on broadband access. She said she and Jim Northup participated. The state <br /> officials pushed the conversation to the limit without supporting changes to the state law. They <br /> make it sound like they are doing the best they can to help everybody, but they did not try to <br /> change any of those laws. The problem is the lobbying by the telecommunications companies. <br /> Commissioner Rich said that the County already is providing subsidies through its <br /> hotspots program. They are already partnering, and need to figure out how to expand the <br /> partnership. <br /> In reply to a question from Commissioner Rich, John Roberts said it is not specifically <br /> prohibited under state law for the County to distribute hotspot devices to residents. <br /> In reply to a question from Commissioner Burroughs, John Roberts said one or two <br /> North Carolina municipalities, including Wilson, have special legislative authority to provide <br /> internet service. <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said it would be good to know how much it is costing these <br /> municipalities to provide internet services. They keep thinking that it would be better if they had <br /> the authority but they also need some ballpark estimates in order to understand whether they <br /> could afford it. Is this really something they should be hoping for. <br /> Jim Northup said each hotspot costs the County $480 per unit per year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.