Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-16-1993 - VIII-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 11-16-1993
>
Agenda - 11-16-1993 - VIII-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2017 10:24:00 AM
Creation date
2/14/2017 2:41:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/16/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> Lot size requirements would be the same as discussed in the item above. The State mandate <br /> subjects any use which is not residential in nature to the non-residential impervious surface <br /> provisions. <br /> 7. When will BMP's (wetwater detention basins) be required? <br /> Upper Eno and Back Creek Watersheds <br /> BMPs will be required for: <br /> New residential developments which exceed 1 dwelling unit per acre and 12% <br /> impervious surface. <br /> New non-residential projects which exceed 12% impervious surface <br /> Lower Eno Watershed <br /> BMPs will be required for: <br /> New residential developments which exceed 3 dwelling units per acre and 36% <br /> impervious surface (without curb and gutter). <br /> New residential developments which exceed 2 du/acre and 24% impervious surface <br /> (with curb and gutter). <br /> New non-residential projects which exceed 36% impervious surface(without curb and <br /> gutter). <br /> New non-residential projects which exceed 24% impervious surface (with curb and <br /> gutter). <br /> All Other Watersheds <br /> BMPs will not be required. <br /> 8. What advantages and disadvantages result from establishment of an interim five-acre <br /> lot size standard in Cane Creek Watershed? <br /> Advantages <br /> - Greater watershed protection would be provided pending the outcome of the Cane <br /> Creek Study. <br /> _ OWASA and Chapel Hill recommend the higher standards. <br /> - OWASA has made a significant investment in the Cane Creek Reservoir. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.