Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-16-1993 - VII-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 11-16-1993
>
Agenda - 11-16-1993 - VII-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2017 10:20:43 AM
Creation date
2/14/2017 2:38:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/16/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VII-B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3G <br /> 8 <br /> Comment: Both the State and Federal Government have <br /> requirements that apply to the transfer of certain weapons and <br /> that prohibit some persons from acquiring firearms. For <br /> example, North Carolina law provides that permits' for the <br /> sale, transfer or receipt of any pistol, otherwise required, <br /> may not be issued to persons under indictment for most <br /> felonies, fugitives from justice and unlawful users of <br /> narcotics. However, persons in these categories who come into <br /> lawful possession of firearms could continue to possess them. <br /> Additional Town regulations in this area would likely be <br /> challenged as being beyond our statutory authority. <br /> 4 . Regulation Based On The Size Of The Firearms <br /> The Council's August 23 request was for this report to specifically <br /> address regulation of handguns. Recent public discussion of this <br /> subject has focused on the idea of prohibiting handguns, but not <br /> all arms. The State Supreme Court, in the Kerner case, stated that <br /> a prohibition of all pistols would be unconstitutional.' The Court <br /> at the same time stated: <br /> It is also but a reasonable regulation, and one which has <br /> been adopted in some of the states, to require that a <br /> pistol shall not be under a certain length, which if <br /> reasonable will prevent the use of pistols of small size <br /> which are not borne as arms but which are easily and <br /> ordinarily carried concealed. <br /> In State v. Fennell (the 1989 decision cited above) , the Court of <br /> Appeals quoted this language from Kerner and stated: <br /> Thus, the State can regulate the length of a particular <br /> firearm as long as there is a reasonable purpose for <br /> doing so. <br /> Comment: Wile state law prohibits the carrying of any weapon <br /> concealed, the State has not set a minimum size for firearms. <br /> The Court in erne= indicates that some minimum size <br /> requirement, to prohibit small handguns which are easily and <br /> ordinarily concealed, would be constitutionally permissible. <br /> The Town has by state statute the authority to regulate the <br /> display of firearms on the streets, sidewalks, alleys, and <br /> other public property. An argument could be made that the <br /> ' For most counties, including Orange, permits are issued by <br /> the sheriff. In other counties, pistol permits are issued by the <br /> clerk of court. N.C.G.S. Chapter 14, Articles 52A and 53. <br /> The words "pistol• and "handgun■appear to be without legal <br /> distinction for purposes of considering possible regulations. <br /> State v. Faulkner, 168 S.E.2d 9, 13 (N.C. App. 1969) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.