Orange County NC Website
106 <br /> 6291 Orange Grove Road <br /> Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 <br /> August 30, 1993 <br /> The Orange County Planning Board <br /> Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 <br /> Dear Sirs: <br /> According to the August 25 Chapel Hill Herald, pages 3 and 12, OWASA officials are <br /> saying that the already strict lot size and percent impervious area rules imposed on Cane Creek <br /> Watershed residents are not strict enough to suit them. <br /> Several years ago OWASA decided they wanted the community of Orange Grove to <br /> furnish them land for one of Chapel Hill's water supply reservoirs. Now they are demanding that <br /> our residents jump through a special set of expensive environmental hoops to make their lake <br /> water as clean as they think it should be. It supposedly is not as pristine as they predicted it <br /> would be! <br /> In my opinion the Cane Creek Reservoir is not any more important than any other drinking <br /> water reservoir in North Carolina even if it did cost 20 million dollars. For this reason and others <br /> that I will mention subsequently, I think that the rules set forth by the North Carolina <br /> Environmental Management Commission governing all watershed development in North Carolina <br /> are plenty strict to maintain water quality. Additionally, I have been shown absolutely no <br /> legitimate reason why Orange County's rules governing Cane Creek should be any different than <br /> State requirements. <br /> The price of land in Orange Grove is sky high these days since it has become a bedroom <br /> suburb of Chapel Hill, Durham, and Raleigh. If the proposed regulations are forced on Cane <br /> Creek Watershed it will pose severe economic discrimination against many citizens who may want <br /> to live in the area. <br /> If OWASA has its way as proposed in the newspaper report, a house lot in the area may <br /> soon cost a minimum of$50,000. I don't know many wage earners who will be able to afford to <br /> own a lot in Cane Creek Watershed - much less build a home. It seems like the city crowd who <br /> makes the rules wants to replace Cane Creek Watershed farms with only wealthy folks who can <br /> afford to buy large tracts for their country estates. <br /> Excessively strict watershed rules will not only exclude many families who want to buy <br /> land and live in Cane Creek Watershed, but also may make it very difficult for citizens who now <br /> own larger land tracts to utilize them for the purposes for which they have planned. The bottom <br /> line is that all the citizens in the Cane Creek Watershed (present and future) will pay an unfairly <br /> high price for stricter than necessary water quality rules. <br />