Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - 2 - Solid Waste Five Year Financial Plan and Cost Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - 2 - Solid Waste Five Year Financial Plan and Cost Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2017 8:41:31 AM
Creation date
2/13/2017 8:20:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-16-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> Orange County, NC <br /> Financial Plan & Rate Study for Solid Waste Enterprise Fund SCS ENGINEERS <br /> RATE MODEL SCENARIOS <br /> SCS developed two Rate Model scenarios to evaluate impacts to the Enterprise Fund financial <br /> situation over the 5-year planning period. Depending on the individual scenario, the Model <br /> assesses net revenue needs if the Program Fee, other revenues, and operating costs equal those in <br /> the Budget for FY 2016-17 with inflation factors applied, known capital items accounted for, and <br /> other adjustments made to specific line items as detailed in Appendix C: <br /> • Scenario 1 — Scenario 1 assumes status quo for the Department Solid Waste Program <br /> Fee ($107 per year). This scenario is intended to be used as a baseline or"Status <br /> Quo" scenario to enable comparison with Scenario 2. <br /> • Scenario 2—This scenario serves as an assessment of the required increase in the <br /> Program Fee to balance projected operating expenses and revenues for solid waste <br /> and recycling services. Scenario 2 assumes the Program Fee balances the Fund's <br /> annual budget if other revenues and operating costs equal those projected in the <br /> Budget for FY 2016-17, dependent on the sub-scenario. This iteration serves as a <br /> "break-even" analysis. <br /> Model Results <br /> The table below(and also in Section 2.1.8, Exhibit 12) shows the Modeled Budgetary Gap for <br /> Scenario 1 and the break-even Program Fees for Scenario 2 for FY 2016-17 to FY 2020-21. Note <br /> that the Program Fee was back-calculated using an optimization algorithm. Complete financial <br /> model results highlighting the Fund's projected annual net revenue/deficits are presented in <br /> Appendix F. <br /> Scenario Modeling Results <br /> Scenario FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 <br /> 1 — Status Quo Budgetary <br /> Gap with $107 Program ($1,780,040) ($2,015,497) ($2,064,603) ($2,345,290) ($2,593,011) <br /> Fee <br /> 2— Break Even Program <br /> Fee with $0 Budgetary $137 $140 $141 $145 $148 <br /> Gap <br /> Note: Negative values indicate a projected gap. <br /> ES-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.