Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - 2 - Solid Waste Five Year Financial Plan and Cost Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - 2 - Solid Waste Five Year Financial Plan and Cost Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2017 8:41:31 AM
Creation date
2/13/2017 8:20:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-16-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47 <br /> Orange County, NC <br /> Financial Plan and Rate Study for Solid Waste Enterprise Fund SCS ENGINEERS <br /> LIST OF MODEL ASSUMPTIONS <br /> GENERAL <br /> • The County provided FY 2016-17 Budget values for revenues and expenses <br /> associated with the Enterprise Fund. SCS compared these values with the previous 3 <br /> years of"Past Actual"values for FY 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15, as well as the <br /> FY 2015-16 Original Budget and Revised Budget values, to assess the reasonableness <br /> of the Budget. Obviously, certain revenues and expenses have been dramatically <br /> changed since the closing of the County's sanitary landfill in June 2013. Generally <br /> speaking, SCS concluded that the FY 2016-17 Budget values for the anticipated <br /> revenues and operating expenses that the County provided were appropriate and <br /> reasonable based on our understanding of the County's solid waste and recycling <br /> programs and facilities operating under each of the four divisions. Furthermore, SCS <br /> concluded that the FY 2016-17 Budget values for approximately 33 revenue line <br /> items and 50 operating expense line items were appropriate to serve as the baseline, <br /> or "Test Year" for projecting the subsequent four future fiscal year revenues and <br /> operating expenses. The exact manner in which these projections were accomplished <br /> is described below. <br /> • Line item accounts that had a value of zero for the FY 2016-17 Budget were <br /> anticipated to be zero for all future years and, thus, were essentially excluded from <br /> the analysis. Only Revenue and Expense account line items with a value greater than <br /> zero were included in this analysis. <br /> • Future projections for line items are escalated using the annual inflationary factor of <br /> 2.1%, which represents a calculated average of historical CPI. <br /> • For purposes of characterizing annual deficits within the Enterprise Fund as being <br /> funded by revenue that would originate from potential increases to the County's <br /> property tax rate (per$100 of assessed value), SCS assumed that each $0.01 <br /> incremental increase to the tax rate yielded$1,655,660 in annual revenue. <br /> REVENUES <br /> • Future projections for the 33 revenue line item accounts for the four subsequent fiscal <br /> years (FY 2017-18, FY 2018-19, FY 2019-20, and FY 2020-21) are either maintained <br /> constant or escalated using the annual inflationary factor and the Test Year as the <br /> baseline, unless noted in the table below as being handled differently. <br /> • County Solid Waste Programs Fee: The current fiscal year(FY 2015-16) is the first <br /> year in which this revenue line item account has been in effect and SCS understand it <br /> reflects the initial Program Fee of$107 applied to 60,178 parcels. Projections for the <br /> four future fiscal years were escalated by 1.1%,which is the projected annual <br /> population growth, to reflect the fee being assessed for additional parcels. <br /> c- 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.