Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - 2 - Solid Waste Five Year Financial Plan and Cost Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 02-16-2017 - 2 - Solid Waste Five Year Financial Plan and Cost Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2017 8:41:31 AM
Creation date
2/13/2017 8:20:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-16-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
39 <br /> Orange County, NC <br /> Financial Plan & Rate Study for Solid Waste Enterprise Fund SCS ENGINEERS <br /> 5.2 EXPENSE REDUCTION STRATEGIES <br /> SCS performed a cursory overview of Department programs to identify opportunities to reduce <br /> expenses in order to reduce the quantity of General Fund monies to Enterprise Fund. Expense <br /> reduction strategies identified include: <br /> • Commercial curbside collection and residential drop-off collection of food and other <br /> organic wastes currently cost the Department$80 per ton under its contract with <br /> Brooks Contracting. The Department could encourage residents to compost at home <br /> to reduce expenditure by the Department and keep the waste closer to its point of <br /> origin for direct reuse. Alternatively, the County could shift the costs of the program <br /> to its largest benefiters, business entities. <br /> • Reduce debt servicing costs by continuing to contribute to an equipment reserve fund <br /> with which replacement equipment is purchased outright. Consider implementation of <br /> an R&E fund as a long-term objective to pay for unexpected costs outright, rather <br /> than relying on debt financing. <br /> • Consider altering Waste and Recycling Center hours or days of operations to <br /> minimize down-time and reduce staff/maintenance costs per customer served. <br /> • Establish a long-term financial plan that provides a sustainable financial structure for <br /> the Fund. This plan should be formed as a result of a continued evaluation of <br /> Department programs to identify issues and inefficiencies (if any exist), optimize the <br /> structure of the Department, and find opportunities to further share resources among <br /> the four Divisions, in addition to other tasks to increase the effectiveness of the <br /> implementation of solid waste and recycling services. <br /> 5.3 RATE BENCHMARKING <br /> Exhibit 19 graphically illustrates a comparison of the County's FY 2015-16 Program Fee of$107 <br /> with other North Carolina Counties' cumulative Solid Waste Fee rates. As shown, the annual <br /> solid waste fees for various municipalities range from a low of$15 to approximately$250. It is <br /> unclear what governmental subsidies exist for the communities with the lower fees or what <br /> services are provided for the corresponding fees. It is also important to consider the level of <br /> service offered by Orange County and the emphasis on environmental justice in regards to waste <br /> reduction and recycling, including the achievement of a 64 percent recycling rate. It is not likely <br /> to be matched by many, if any, of these jurisdictions. <br /> Benchmarking of solid waste agencies is often difficult to accomplish since levels of service and <br /> internal charges and subsidies are often difficult to discern from one municipal system to <br /> another. As such, most benchmarking programs often deal with individual facilities (e.g., <br /> landfills, transfer stations, etc.). There is currently a lack of benchmarking data available in the <br /> solid waste industry. SWANA has conducted the most recent benchmarking studies, but these <br /> were focused on landfill operations. <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.