Orange County NC Website
1 <br /> ORANGE C O U N T Y <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: September 7, 1993 <br /> Agenda Abstract <br /> Item # 11Lar-L, <br /> SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT <br /> (ARTICLES 6 .23 - 6.25 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REGULATED) <br /> DEPARTMENT: Planning PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No <br /> ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: <br /> Proposed Ordinance Amendment Planning Director X2592 <br /> Draft 5/24/93 Public Hearing <br /> Minutes PHONE NUMBERS: <br /> Planning Director 7/28/93 Hillsborough 732-8181 <br /> Memorandum Mebane 227-2031 <br /> County Attorney 8/9/93 Letter Durham 688-7331 <br /> Draft 8/16/93 Planning Board Chapel Hill 967-9251 <br /> Minutes <br /> PURPOSE: To consider a proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendment <br /> which would permit property owners to satisfy <br /> impervious surface ratios in protected watersheds <br /> through provision of a perpetual conservation easement <br /> on adjoining property. <br /> BACKGROUND: In November, 1984, Orange County's watershed <br /> protection standards were updated. Included among <br /> the revisions were changes to required impervious <br /> surface ratios. The schedule of ratios adopted in <br /> 1984 is shown in Table 6.23.4 and were revised based <br /> on the recommendations of TJCOG. <br /> One year later, another amendment was adopted to <br /> address the difficulties experienced by some <br /> property owners in meeting the ratios contained in <br /> Table 6 .23.4 . Provisions were added which would <br /> permit individual property owners to apply for a <br /> modification of the impervious surface ratios. The <br /> specific provisions applicable to such situations <br /> are contained in Article 8. 8 .26. <br /> One situation which prompted the amendment was that <br /> of the Orange Grove Volunteer Fire Department. In <br /> June of 1985, the Board of Adjustment had denied a <br /> request by the Fire Department for a variance of the <br /> impervious surface ratio and percentage of <br /> undisturbed area applicable in Cane Creek Watershed. <br /> The subsequent amendment which added Article 8.8 .26 <br /> did nothing to assist the Fire Department in terms <br /> of its expansion plans. <br />