Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-23-1993 - C 2 and C 3 attch
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 08-23-1993
>
Agenda - 08-23-1993 - C 2 and C 3 attch
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2017 3:15:15 PM
Creation date
2/6/2017 1:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/23/1993
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C 2 and C 3 attch
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
feet deep. A shallow forebay and an "aquatic bench" 10 to 20 feet wide around the perimeter <br /> is suggested. (To avoid access problems that shallow edges create for recreational use, <br /> 14 <br /> ,constructing a pier before the pond is filled can provide access for swimming, boating, and <br /> ffishing.) <br /> The Pond Environment <br /> Many of the characteristics of a pond that enhance pollutant capture and treatment (shallow <br /> water, plant and algae growth) have a negative impact on its aesthetic qualities (mosquitos, odor, <br /> turbidity, algae). These must be balanced if the pond is to serve multiple uses, such as <br /> recreation, by providing shallow areas to encourage vegetation and deeper areas for access and <br /> recreation. <br /> WARNING ! <br /> Designers, developers, and potential residents must be informed that the pond will not <br /> necessarily be an ideal water environment because its purpose of capturing and treating pollution <br /> almost certainly precludes this. The intent is to protect water quality downstream, not in the <br /> pond itself. To improve the quality of the water in the pond the volume should be increased <br /> above the minimum required while not exceeding the size that the watershed can keep the pond <br /> full. <br /> Peak Discharge Control for Streambank Protection <br /> An additional function of the pond must be to control the increase in the peak rate of runoff <br /> from the site. The post-development discharge below the outlets for the two-year and ten-year <br /> storms must not exceed the predevelopment rates. The purpose is to protect the receiving <br /> channel from erosion resulting from the increased rate and volume of runoff. Installing a <br /> dewatering device to store the one inch runoff volume above the permanent pool may meet or <br /> exceed this requirement, but this needs to be confirmed and calculations provided. <br /> The optimal level of flood control and streambank protection is when multiple design storms are <br /> controlled, both the 2-year and 10-year design storm is sufficient. <br /> Because development of the site will surely increase the rate and volume of runoff above the <br /> pond, provisions must be made for protecting the channels upstream of the pond so that they do <br /> not erode and cause unacceptable levels of sediment to be carried into the pond. <br /> Pipes <br /> The use of reinforced concrete pipe is encouraged because of its long life even though it may <br /> be more difficult and expensive to install initially. Plain corrugated metal pipe (CMP) is not <br /> acceptable. It must be coated (preferably aluminized) because of the short life expectancy of <br /> plain pipe and the trouble and expense of replacement, in addition to the risk of failure of the <br /> structure. <br /> Pipe Inlet Protection <br /> A trash rack or hood is required to trap debris in the pond and prevent the outlet from clogging. <br /> Wire screen or bars across the inlet is not acceptable because trash and debris can accumulate <br /> over the inlet and such devices reduces the efficiency of the inlet. <br /> DRAFT 8 June 1993 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.