Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
15 <br /> O ��t Reid asked if there could be problems at a later <br /> time with RCD (Resource Conservation District) <br /> comparable to problems which can be experienced <br /> in Chapel Hill which prohibits construction in <br /> such areas. Hinkley responded that in the case <br /> of lots 4, 5 and 6 there is sufficient residual <br /> for construction outside of the floodplain. <br /> Willis added that the Flood Damage Prevention <br /> Ordinance prohibits construction in the <br /> floodplain itself unless structures are elevated <br /> above the floodplain through engineering. <br /> Burklin asked if the 100-year floodplain is to be <br /> surveyed and staked out so the exact location is <br /> evident. Yuhasz responded that USGS topo maps <br /> are used and that elevations are not always <br /> exact. Be continued that the reason for putting <br /> the floodplain on the plat is to let possible <br /> buyers know that there are potential problems <br /> before they purchase such lots. Willis noted <br /> that distance from the floodplain is verified at <br /> the time of application for a building permit. <br /> If the distance is unclear, then, further survey <br /> may be required at that point. <br /> Scott noted that banks that are financing <br /> construction loans also verify the possibility of <br /> a floodplain and may require additional <br /> surveying. <br /> Yuhasz noted that the Environmental Health <br /> Department has already approved septic tank sites <br /> and repair area for the lots . <br /> Discussion followed regarding location of the <br /> joint driveway. Yuhasz stated that joint <br /> driveways are usually 50 to 60 feet wide centered <br /> along the property line. Waddell responded that <br /> would address his concern. <br /> MOTION: Reid moved approval as recommended by the <br /> Planning Staff with an additional condition that <br /> a joint driveway for lots 5 and 6 be constructed <br /> with the improvements on the property to cross <br /> the drainage easement. Seconded by Walters . <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. <br /> 1 abstained (new member) . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #9 : MATTERS PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC HEARING <br /> a. Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments <br /> ( 1) CP-3-93 Bobby Kirk, Sr. & Jr. <br />