Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
26 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 55 <br /> 56 PUBLIC CHARGE <br /> 57 The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its <br /> 58 citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful,courteous manner, both with the Board and with <br /> 59 fellow citizens. At any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this <br /> 60 public charge,the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual <br /> 61 regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting <br /> 62 until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. <br /> 63 <br /> 64 <br /> 65 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS <br /> 66 <br /> 67 No comments <br /> 68 <br /> 69 AGENDA ITEM 7: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENT- To re-review and make a <br /> 70 recommendation to the BOCC on government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO to <br /> 71 modify the Mobile Home Park Conditional Zoning District (MHP-CZ) to a Home Park <br /> 72 Conditional Zoning District (HP-CZ). The Planning Board recommendation approval of this <br /> 73 item on December 7, 2016; subsequent revisions by the County Attorney's office necessitates <br /> 74 that the amendment be reviewed again by the Planning Board. This item is scheduled for the <br /> 75 February 13, 2017 Quarterly Public Hearing. <br /> 76 <br /> 77 Patrick Mallett Presented the proposed changes that were made to materials since the December 7, 2016 Planning <br /> 78 Board Meeting and needed to meet legal sufficiency. <br /> 79 <br /> 80 Craig Benedict told Patrick Mallett that when he presents this item he can explain that it has not changed from the <br /> 81 way it was originally. <br /> 82 <br /> 83 Patrick Mallett continued his presentation. <br /> 84 <br /> 85 Buddy Hartley asked how they will enforce the regulations. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 Michael Harvey explained there are conditions for the approval for the certificate of occupancy,which often include <br /> 88 time limits on how long the temporary structure can stay on the property.After that time frame if the structure is still <br /> 89 there the Planning Department issues a notice of violation;the notice of violation will allow the resident 30 days to <br /> 90 remove it, after that 30 days it is a$500 a day fine. <br /> 91 <br /> 92 Patricia Roberts asked if there is a second impact fee if you build an efficiency unit. <br /> 93 <br /> 94 Michael Harvey said that you do have to pay another impact fee based on the number of bedrooms of the efficiency <br /> 95 and then pay the difference in the number of bedrooms in the new house you're building. <br /> 96 <br /> 97 Patrick Mallett continued reviewing the abstract and text changes. <br /> 98 <br /> 99 Tony Blake asked what the attorney's concerns were with this text amendment <br /> 100 <br /> 101 Patrick Mallett said that we needed to focus on what goes on in a mobile home park. The previous recommendation <br /> 102 by the Planning Board dealt too much sections beyond the scope of this amendment. <br /> 103 <br /> 104 Craig Benedict explained that we will be coming up with a new method so that we don't keep bringing things back <br /> 105 and forth to the Planning Board. <br /> 106 <br /> 107 Patrick Mallett continued reviewing the abstract and text changes. <br /> 108 <br /> 2 <br />