Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-07-2017 - 8-a - Durham Chapel Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 02-07-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-07-2017 - 8-a - Durham Chapel Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2017 4:38:48 PM
Creation date
2/3/2017 8:34:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/7/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-07-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> the MPO for future transportation needs. The presentation, provided in Attachment 1, will <br /> provide more information about the CTP, its relationship to other plans, and its importance with <br /> respect to reserving right-of-way. <br /> Relationship to Other Plans <br /> The CTP is the overarching transportation plan for the DCHC MPO. As a State requirement, the <br /> CTP replaces the Thoroughfare plans that have been conducted in North Carolina since the <br /> 1950s. With a focus on multi-modal transportation, the CTP is designed to work within a <br /> planning framework, which includes the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the State <br /> Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). <br /> Projects included in other Orange County transportation plans, including the Orange County Bus <br /> and Rail Investment Plan, must be included in the CTP. While CTPs are not regularly updated, <br /> they can be amended. If local projects and priorities change and projects are specifically <br /> removed from local plans, the CTP can be amended. It is, however, important to note that the <br /> CTP represents an aspirational, non-fiscally constrained, long-range transportation network and <br /> includes all possible transportation improvements. While some of these transportation <br /> improvements may never come to pass based on funding or feasibility, this plan indicates a <br /> long-range vision that supports a robust multi-modal transportation network and provides a <br /> diversity of projects for programming in subsequent fiscally constrained plans and funding <br /> programs. <br /> Products <br /> The final CTP will contain two distinct elements, the CTP Maps (Attachment 2) and the CTP <br /> Study Report. The CTP Study Report contains a great deal of background information including <br /> problem statements for specific projects and a summary of the CTP process. The Highway <br /> Minimum Problem Statements document is provided as an example (Attachment 3). The entire <br /> draft document, all of the maps, and explanatory tables for each mode can be found at this <br /> link: http://bltJy/2bv3ROV. It is important to note that the NCDOT Board of Transportation only <br /> approves the CTP maps; this body does not approve the CTP Study Report. <br /> CTP Footnote <br /> In many communities, the dedication of right-of-way to support associated cross-sections for the <br /> construction of new facilities or the enhancement of existing facilities is handled using <br /> subdivision/land development ordinances or special zoning entitlements. In Orange County, <br /> however, land is often developed "by right" under existing zoning. In order to compel <br /> developers/sub-dividers/etc. to dedicate right-of-way for new streets/highways or to improve <br /> existing streets/highways, an adopted CTP is required. The CTP requirement would, however, <br /> only apply if the jurisdiction is interested in acquiring the dedication through its zoning <br /> processes, subdivision control ordinances, and/or special zoning entitlements. It is the opinion of <br /> the County Attorney that no other planning policy guide (e.g. small area plans, locally adopted <br /> corridor plans, special district plans, etc.) can legally compel right-of-way dedication when the <br /> dedication is being sought through zoning, subdivision, or any other land use control <br /> ordinances. <br /> With this in mind, staff has worked with the MPO and with NCDOT Transportation Planning <br /> branch for over two years to create language linking local access management plans and small <br /> area plans to the CTP, i.e. to ensure that the roadway alignments in these plans are equivalent <br /> to CTP alignments. This will provide solid footing to support requiring the dedication of the right- <br /> of-way in development projects that are programmed "by right." The following language has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.