Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-07-2017 - 8-a - Durham Chapel Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 02-07-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-07-2017 - 8-a - Durham Chapel Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2017 4:38:48 PM
Creation date
2/3/2017 8:34:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/7/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-07-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> Key Products o s iii hwa <br /> g v <br /> (continued) <br /> Main Table <br /> Segment 20 Existing System 20 Proposed System <br /> 0 <br /> Existing 2040 a <br /> Dist. Capacity 2015 Volume 2040 Cross- CTP Z °E <br /> Facility From To (mi) J ROW Width (vpd) Volume E+C VIC Section Class a` n <br /> INC.751 Renaissance Pkwy Stagecoach Rd DurCity, Dur 0.9 2 60-90 19-24 12,700 12,000 18,777 1.5 NI 4D Blvd None <br /> NC:751 1-40 1 Renaissance Pkwy DurCity 1 0.2 1 2 60 24 12,700 1 26,618 1 41,544 3.3 Ex ADQ Maj UAD <br /> INC.751 I-40 ISouthpoint AutoparkBlvd DurCity 0.2 4 60 24 36,600 15,000 30,622 0.8 Ex ADQ Blvd None <br /> INC.751 ISouthpoint Autopark Blvd I NC:54 DurCity 0.8 2 60 24 12,700 2.4 NI 40 Blvd None <br /> • 2040 volume and volume/capacity Z' <br /> (i.e., congestion level) <br /> • Projected future cross-section. Abides by <br /> Complete Streets. Remember: <br /> environmental process determines ultimate <br /> Other cross-section design. <br /> • Problem statements - Eight Full and thirty-one minimum <br /> statements ; explains why improvements are needed <br /> • Unaddressed needs - explains why roadway that is over <br /> capacity does not have improvements designated <br /> Very T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.