Orange County NC Website
as <br />o. <br />A 2 <br />EFLAND SEWER SYSTEM <br />Proposal for Rate Study for Small Wastewater Collection Utility <br />the first five years of operations considering the initial unit rate as set forth in the Inter-Local <br />Agreement and agreed upon by the eight (8) original member entities. <br />PROJECT DETAILS Birmingham Water Works Board, .Alabama <br />Cost of Service Study RFC conducted a cost of service study for the Bimvngham Water Works and Sewer Board <br />Rate Study (the `Board"). The Board provides retail water service to over 200,000 customers, retail <br />Bond Feasibility <br />Rate Model sewer service to over 3,000 customers, and raw water to over 100 industrial accounts. <br />RSE Process Through a cost of service study, RFC developed a rate stabilization and equalization ("RSE") <br />Affordability <br />Miscellaneous Fees process. As a part of a legal settlement with the Citp of Birmingham, the Board agreed to <br />come under regulation by the Alabama Public Service Commission ("I'SC'~. Other utilities <br />REFERENCE re ted b the Alabama PSC have develo ed RSE rocesses to sim rate film While <br />Mr. Mac Underwood ~ y p P p~ g' <br />General Manager the existing RSE's are based on rate of return metrics, the Board's RSE had to be developed <br />Birmingham Water Works Board to ensure debt service coverage requirements are satisfied. The RSE process defines when a <br />3600 First Avenue North <br />Birmingham, AL 35222 rate increase or decrease is warranted. Once the Alabama PSC accepts the RSE, the Board's <br />Phone: (205) 244-4403 rates will increase without the Board being forced to enact the increase. By doing so, rate <br />issues should become depoliticized. <br />As part of the cost of service study, RFC also reviewed the methodology used to develop <br />miscellaneous fees such as tap connection fees, reconnection fee, and bad order plumbing, <br />and provided recommendations for revising the fee calculations. In addition, RFC examined <br />potential affordability programs. RFC has also recently begun a project to develop system <br />development charges for the Board. <br />Over the past four years, RFC has assisted the Board in preparing official. statements for <br />three bond offerings in the amounts of $300 million, $84 million, and $90 million. RFC <br />developed a program. of rate increases necessary to pap the debt service and meet the bond <br />requirements, assisted in preparing a presentation for the rating agencies, and RFC personnel <br />participated in meetings with the rating agencies. <br />PROJECT DETAILS Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities, North Carolina <br />Cost of Service Study RFC originally assisted Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities ("Utilities") in developing a water <br />Rate Study and sewer financial planning and rate model and related user manual The rate model has <br />Rate Model <br />been used to update rates and assist with Utilities' financial planning. The model focused on <br />REFERENCE providing long-term. rates, management information, and graphic representations of model <br />Mr. Doug Bean ou ut. Since the o al model develo men RFC has rovided assistance in u datin and <br />Director ~' ~ P ~ p P g <br />Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities refining the rate model on an annual basis. Recently, RFC completed a comprehensive <br />5100 Brookshire Boulevard revision to the methodology used to calculate certain. industrial. waste charges. As part of <br />Charlotte, North Carolina 28216 <br />Phone: (704) 399-2221 this project, RFC examined many different approaches, calculated the costs and impacts of <br />implementing a new approach, and participated in meetings with Utilities' Advisory Council <br />and the public to discuss the new recommended approach. Additionally, RFC has assisted <br />Utilities in performing risk analysis on its revenue stream. Following years of abnormally dry <br />~~ weather, the Charlotte area has received above average rainfall. As a result, revenues <br />ONSULTANTS, NC.16 <br />