Orange County NC Website
5 <br /> <br />Commissioner Dorosin referred to the 5-12 minor subdivision, and clarified that a minor 1 <br />subdivision can go up to 12 lots, if it clusters the lot and has open space, and if there is an entity 2 <br />to manage that open space. 3 <br />Patrick Mallett said yes. He said above the cap, there must be a proportional amount of 4 <br />open space. 5 <br />Commissioner Dorosin said it is not an increase of density, because most of these could 6 <br />accomplish that density, but choose not to because of not wanting to fall into the major 7 <br />subdivision category. 8 <br />Patrick Mallett said yes. 9 <br />Commissioner Dorosin said this is exciting. 10 <br />Commissioner Rich agreed that she liked this proposal. She referred to page 1-63, and 11 <br />asked if there is a reason that developers are only being encouraged to support connectivity, 12 <br />and not strongly encouraged. 13 <br />Patrick Mallett said the reality is that with subdivisions you look at the big picture and try 14 <br />to look for opportunities for connectivity. 15 <br />James Bryan said staff has to go by the ordinance, and the ordinance has to have very 16 <br />clear standards. He said the Board of County Commissioners has discretion over projects but 17 <br />staff does not, thus the word “encourage”. 18 <br />Commissioner Rich brought up her neighborhood, saying it flows nicely with the open 19 <br />spaces. She said she hoped, when applicable, that all would encourage connectivity with open 20 <br />spaces. 21 <br />Patrick Mallett said this is in the context of a minor subdivision only, which can go up to a 22 <br />maximum of 12 lots. 23 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he is supportive of this proposal. He said he did not hear the 24 <br />attorney say the Board could not do it, but just that the Board must be specific in the ordinance. 25 <br />He said being connected to contiguous open space could be required, unless it is not possible. 26 <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to page 122-2-b3, and said the fire department used to 27 <br />be on the list, but is not anymore. He asked if there is a reason why the fire department is no 28 <br />longer included. 29 <br />Patrick Mallett said there are other elements and newer standards that may change 30 <br />these lists. 31 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said being part of the process is where they came up with access 32 <br />to a water resource and increasing the density in an area being served. 33 <br />Patrick Mallett said part of that is covered with pedestrian oriented open space area, 34 <br />which says an area cannot be blocked off without providing access. 35 <br />Commissioner Price said when she was on the Planning Board they requested a Fire 36 <br />Marshal or an Emergency Services member to be part of their development advisory committee. 37 <br />Patrick Mallett said these departments are on the development advisory committee. 38 <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if all of these entities are on the committee. 39 <br />Patrick Mallett said for the most part these entities participate, and it is in another part of 40 <br />the ordinance. 41 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said minor subdivisions do not require a public process, but a 42 <br />major subdivision does. He asked Patrick Mallett if this is correct. 43 <br />Patrick Mallett said yes. He said the main difference is that minor subdivisions are 44 <br />usually on family owned lands. 45 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said his concern would echo what just happened with Ashwick, 46 <br />and that a minor subdivision will only come to the Board’s notice when staff has already 47 <br />approved it, since it is a staff process. He said he is favor of the concept, but asked if there is a 48 <br />way to allow public involvement. 49 <br />Patrick Mallett said with a minor subdivision of five units there are not neighborhood 50 <br />meetings. 51 <br />13