Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-24-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 01-24-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-24-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2017 11:03:50 AM
Creation date
1/20/2017 11:02:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/24/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-24-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> 1 he was unsure if this neighborhood's Home Owners Association (HOA) is aware of these <br /> 2 proposed changes. He asked if the proposed changes move forward, how does this affect the <br /> 3 homeowners adjacent to these properties and their property values. He also asked if zoning <br /> 4 could be more thoroughly explained, and what does this zoning classification include. <br /> 5 Chair McKee said there is no one here to answer his property value question. <br /> 6 Michael Harvey said, from a land use stand point, a manufacturing operation could be <br /> 7 built on this property under the current industrial zoning designation. He said if the parcel is re- <br /> 8 zoned general commercial, there could be a restaurant, office space, grocery store, retail, etc. <br /> 9 He said any development would have to go through the site plan approval process, demonstrate <br /> 10 compliance with the various set backs, parking, land use, etc. <br /> 11 Michael Harvey said there was a letter sent to the Ashwick HOA, as well as everyone <br /> 12 living within 1,000 feet. <br /> 13 Rob Gray said he did not mean to imply that there was no attempt to contact the HOA. <br /> 14 He said he is concerned about what can be built on this land under the new zoning designation, <br /> 15 and he suggested possibly breaking this up in different segments to review in greater detail. <br /> 16 Guerry Sterling Willis said she is also from Ashwick, and she found out about this topic <br /> 17 on Saturday. She said the homeowners are concerned about property values, congestion, <br /> 18 noise pollution, and water pollution. <br /> 19 Kimberly Gush said she also lives in the Ashwick Community and echoed the concerns <br /> 20 of the other two speakers. <br /> 21 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the parcel, to which the public is referring, is currently <br /> 22 under zoning that makes it vulnerable to the changes that the residents fear. <br /> 23 Michael Harvey said the current zoning allows for manufacturing operation on the <br /> 24 property, which is more detrimental then the general commercial zoning. He said there are <br /> 25 regulatory statutes in place that may address some of the resident's concerns. He said it his <br /> 26 opinion that there is a more reasonable zoning designation that is more consistent with the <br /> 27 current plans, policy and County vision for this area. <br /> 28 Commissioner Price said the general commercial zoning will also allow offices, and this <br /> 29 would be less intense than a manufacturing business. <br /> 30 Commissioner Pelissier asked if the total number of acres could be identified. <br /> 31 Michael Harvey said it is a total of four to five acres. <br /> 32 Chair McKee asked if this property will still be bound by the regulatory statutes in place <br /> 33 for parking, watershed, etc. <br /> 34 Michael Harvey said yes, and that also means compliance with the storm water <br /> 35 ordinance. <br /> 36 Chair McKee asked if the tract that has the golf cart repair business could be switched to <br /> 37 a manufacturing facility now. <br /> 38 Michael Harvey said yes, under the existing industrial zoning designation. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to <br /> 41 close the public hearing. (Note that, because this is a legislative decision, additional comments <br /> 42 at a later date are permitted). <br /> 43 <br /> 44 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Commissioner Jacobs said this is being presented to the Board as a package, but asked <br /> 47 if one parcel could be removed. <br /> 48 Michael Harvey said yes, if the Board is specific. <br /> 49 Commissioner Jacobs said he approved what the staff did, but he does understand the <br /> 50 concerns of the Ashwick residents. He would like to afford the community the opportunity to ask <br /> 51 additional questions, and bring the item back at a later date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.