Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-24-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 01-24-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-24-2017 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2017 11:03:50 AM
Creation date
1/20/2017 11:02:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/24/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-24-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> 1 to engineering is time sensitive, and allows far more specific information to be gathered prior to <br /> 2 making decisions about major financial commitments. <br /> 3 Alderman Chaney said Town Council Member Cianciolo's point is well taken. She <br /> 4 asked if the number of people, who will get out of their cars if this project is built, is known. <br /> 5 Danny Rogers said about 24,000 per day. <br /> 6 Patrick McDonough, Manager of Planning for GoTriangle, said just under 27,000 riders <br /> 7 per day, when including the NCCU station; and another 20,000 when including the bus trips to <br /> 8 and from the various light rail stations. <br /> 9 Alderman Chaney said that is a lot of people who will benefit from this project. She said <br /> 10 she hoped that the Board of County Commissioners will think about getting to the next step. <br /> 11 She said they want to achieve the goal so badly, and it is the proportion that has changed not <br /> 12 the cost. She said there is a risk here but she, as a taxpayer, is willing to take that risk. <br /> 13 Commissioner Jacobs said he suggested on Tuesday night, the need to re-negotiate the <br /> 14 formula with Durham. He said before moving forward in April, he would like to know who is <br /> 15 going to do the value engineering. He said he would like to see independent value engineering, <br /> 16 and he asked if there is a development coordinator to solicit funds from the universities and the <br /> 17 private sector. <br /> 18 Commissioner Jacobs said, at some point, the BOCC will need information from Chapel <br /> 19 Hill about the extension of the BRT, the tripling of the cost, and why the BOCC has not been a <br /> 20 part of this conversation. He said the topic of affordable housing along the light rail also needs <br /> 21 to be revisited. <br /> 22 Mayor Hemminger said the Town Council was working today to see what is happening <br /> 23 with the BRT, since they just heard about this. She said the Town would work on the affordable <br /> 24 housing request. She said three of the stops are UNC owned and will not include affordable <br /> 25 housing. She said Glenn Lennox is already built out, and the only other opportunities are the <br /> 26 Woodmont and Gateway stations. <br /> 27 Town Commissioner Weaver said she wanted to speak up for those in the northern part <br /> 28 of the County, and she sees the benefit to the light rail project. She said there are a lot of risks <br /> 29 and unknowns, but this current step is really important, and she does not want to lose sight of <br /> 30 the bigger picture and overall benefits. <br /> 31 Commissioner Pelissier said sometimes risks have to be taken, and voting to at least <br /> 32 look at funding options is not that big of a risk. She hopes her colleagues will vote in favor of <br /> 33 doing so. She said light rail will add to affordability. <br /> 34 Commissioner Jacobs said just because the Board of County Commissioners asks <br /> 35 tough questions, it does not indicate any lesser commitment to light rail and affordability. He <br /> 36 said the BOCC will have to deal with the consequences of adding more funding. <br /> 37 Alderman Slade said the engineering phase is rapidly approaching, and asked if it is <br /> 38 realistic that GoTriangle will be able to meet the deadline. <br /> 39 Danny Rogers said the process is on track, and if a financial plan is in place they should <br /> 40 be in good shape to submit it to FTA. He said it would then wait to be seen as to how FTA <br /> 41 reacts to said plan. <br /> 42 Commissioner Rich said the Board of County Commissioners is supportive of this <br /> 43 project, and it would be a shame to throw this all away. She commended Commissioner <br /> 44 Pelissier for all of her hard work on this. <br /> 45 Chair McKee asked if, funding gap aside, there is a firm, written commitment from Duke <br /> 46 to pick up any Right of Way (ROW). <br /> 47 Danny Rogers said Duke has made a commitment to donate the ROW, and is putting <br /> 48 together a letter of intent to that effect. <br /> 49 Chair McKee asked if there is a commitment for $25 million, or if that is for the ROW. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.