Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
18 <br /> 1 John Roberts said knowing that this is the intent, staff can look at language to address <br /> 2 this with a later amendment. <br /> 3 Commissioner Rich asked if the motion could be restated. <br /> 4 Commissioner Dorosin said the motion is to adopt the grandfathering language about <br /> 5 the one-year grandfathering and the 180 calendar days, and that is the provision that will be <br /> 6 studied to see if it is a loophole that can be closed or clarified. <br /> 7 Commissioner Jacobs said he would defer this item until the December 5th meeting, and <br /> 8 ask staff to come back with a tighter rein, and a timeframe that will allow flexibility, but will not <br /> 9 give away the store. <br /> 10 John Roberts suggested adopting the ordinance as amended, with the 75/25 split and <br /> 11 the 7.5% implement change, but not the grandfathering issue and 180 day provision, which will <br /> 12 be brought back for future discussion. <br /> 13 Chair McKee said it is his understanding that the Board adopted the 75/25 split, and the <br /> 14 7.5% implementation change. He said the grandfathering issue is all that remains. <br /> 15 John Roberts said Commissioner Dorosin made a motion to choose those two things, <br /> 16 but the Board has not adopted the ordinance amendment itself. He said the Board will need to <br /> 17 go back to number three, and authorize finalization of the study and adopt its results. He said <br /> 18 the Board has not actually adopted the ordinance. <br /> 19 Commissioner Dorosin withdrew the last motion he made. <br /> 20 Commissioner Pelissier agreed. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br /> 23 authorize finalization of the school impact fee study reports by the consultant (TischlerBise). <br /> 24 <br /> 25 VOTE: Ayes, 4 (Commissioner Dorosin, Commissioner Jacobs, Commissioner Rich, <br /> 26 Commissioner Pelissier); Nays, 2 (Chair McKee and Commissioner Price) <br /> 27 <br /> 28 A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br /> 29 adopt attachment 3 subject to the changes above ( Attachment 3 if the Board believes a 75/25 <br /> 30 multi-family unit bedroom split projection is the more realistic projection. (Fees would begin at <br /> 31 43% of the MSIF). <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Commissioner Rich asked if the timeframe for the next study has been determined. <br /> 34 Craig Benedict said nothing about this is included in the ordinance. He said this can be <br /> 35 handled separately as a policy request by the Board; it does not have to be included in the <br /> 36 ordinance. <br /> 37 Commissioner Rich said a plan should be determined, so as to avoid this circumstance <br /> 38 in the future. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 VOTE: Ayes, 4 (Commissioner Dorosin, Commissioner Jacobs, Commissioner Rich, <br /> 41 Commissioner Pelissier); Nays, 2 (Chair McKee and Commissioner Price) <br /> 42 <br /> 43 A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Dorosin for <br /> 44 staff to come back with a timeframe for a follow-up study in four years, and staff to let the Board <br /> 45 know that it is going in the budget year three. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 48 <br /> 49 b. Chapel Hill Town Hall Study Committee <br />