Orange County NC Website
34 <br /> 1 and it becomes increasingly difficult to back off. He said Orange County will be responsible for <br /> 2 at least 25% of costs, if the Board goes forward. He said life causes changes, and noted a <br /> 3 letter from Duke Heath, which voiced major concerns with the project. He said he understands <br /> 4 UNC's support of the project, but says UNC is moving 1,100 jobs out of Chapel Hill. He said <br /> 5 UNC also has a hospital in Hillsborough, which is nowhere near a light rail line. He said Duke <br /> 6 and UNC are developing clinics throughout the area, none of which are on the light rail line. He <br /> 7 said the economic development will only occur in Durham. <br /> 8 Commissioner McKee noted GoTriangle's statement that no funds are being asked for <br /> 9 at this time, but noted further down in the statement that Orange and Durham counties <br /> 10 understand by their actions, that they will "incur costs not anticipated." He said this is as clear <br /> 11 as day that there will be additional costs. He said there is an understanding at large that if the <br /> 12 County backs out now, it will lose all funds already committed. He said this is not his <br /> 13 understanding based on information from GoTriangle, and he asked if this could be clarified: if <br /> 14 the project does not proceed and falls out of the New Starts Program, but gets back in at some <br /> 15 point in the future, what costs would not be eligible for reimbursement from the FTA. He said it <br /> 16 is his understanding that if the project falls out of the New Starts program, and is reinstated at a <br /> 17 later date, the funds spent during the time between are all that would be ineligible for <br /> 18 reimbursement. He said the project could stop tonight, and not all expended funds would be <br /> 19 lost. <br /> 20 Jeff Mann said the County would not be reimbursed unless it was allowed back into the <br /> 21 program. <br /> 22 Commissioner McKee said this is not the explanation that was given to the Board <br /> 23 previously, and this is a perfect example of frustrations with communication. <br /> 24 Commissioner Rich said she would like to get facts to back up what was heard tonight. <br /> 25 Chair Dorosin said Commissioner Jacobs had talked about cost analysis, and <br /> 26 suggested having that in another motion. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 VOTE: Ayes, 5 (Chair Dorosin, Commissioner Jacobs, Commissioner Rich, Commissioner <br /> 29 Marcoplos); Nays, 2 (Commissioner McKee and Commissioner Price) <br /> 30 <br /> 31 A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Rich to <br /> 32 direct the Manager to engage someone to help do independent review of finances and value <br /> 33 engineering choices for this project; direct the Manager to contact Durham to initiate <br /> 34 discussions of reevaluating the split in funding based on changes in mileage and differences in <br /> 35 economic development opportunities in the two counties; revisit Chapel Hill/Orange County bus <br /> 36 split to understand what change a possible bus rapid transit would have on the split and the <br /> 37 ability of Orange County to do what it wants to do; and the Board have an opportunity to <br /> 38 articulate its own County transportation goals. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Commissioner McKee said he already sent a letter to Durham County Chair to open up <br /> 41 these discussions, and this meeting did not take place due to scheduling conflicts; but the door <br /> 42 was left open for this meeting to occur. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Bonnie Hammersley said in anticipation of this evening's meeting, her office put <br /> 47 together a team that will be working on this item. She said Deputy Manager Travis Myren will <br /> 48 be the primary contact for all GoTriangle/D-O LRT questions and concerns. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 8. Reports <br />