Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-07-1993 - III-I
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 06-07-1993
>
Agenda - 06-07-1993 - III-I
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 10:11:03 AM
Creation date
1/19/2017 4:06:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
III-I
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930607
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> NORTH CAROLINA HD <br /> IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE <br /> ORANGE COUNTY 1" '� I. <br /> SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION <br /> . CVs 808 <br /> County of Orange ) <br /> Petitioner <br /> v ) JUDGMENT <br /> Town of Mebane ) <br /> Respondent ) <br /> This cause comes on to be heard by the undersigned <br /> Judge of the Superior Court upon motion by both the petitioner <br /> and the respondent for judgment on the pleadings. <br /> This is an action brought pursuant to Section 1-253 <br /> et seq. of the General Statutes of North Carolina 'for the <br /> interpretation of a contract between the parties , the same <br /> being attached to the petition and marked Exhibit "A, " and <br /> for an adjudication of the rights of the parties pursuant <br /> thereto. The court finds that there is a genuine dispute <br /> between the parties as to the matters set forth in the petition <br /> and that this is a proper case for a declaratory judgment and <br /> for consideration of the relief prayed for in the petition. <br /> The court further finds that there are no material <br /> facts in dispute between the petitioner and the respondent and <br /> that all matters in contention between the parties as set <br /> forth in the petition and the response are contentions as to <br /> matters of law and not of fact, this being a proper case fir <br /> 1 ' final judgment,\ by the court upon a consideration of the <br /> ://1 pleadings and the arguments of counsel <br /> for the parties based <br /> thereon. <br /> The court has considered the pleadings and has heard <br /> arguments of counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.