Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-03-1993 - III-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 05-03-1993
>
Agenda - 05-03-1993 - III-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 9:36:00 AM
Creation date
1/17/2017 3:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/3/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
III-C
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
capacity, and the subdivision <br /> non-conforming aspect of the E <br /> multiple residences on a sing] <br /> amendment eliminates the outrj <br /> further subdivision of lots c/ <br /> access. <br /> The proposed amendment was pre <br /> February 22 , 1993 . There were <br /> public. There were comments z <br /> Gordon regarding the provisior <br /> use of private roads on proper <br /> developed to 90% of its capac: <br /> of Staff that the concerns ra: <br /> subdivision of undeveloped lot <br /> In some cases, the creation ol <br /> a requirement to upgrade the i <br /> subdivision may be prohibitive <br /> is long. This issue is in adc <br /> the proposed amendment, and wz <br /> of Public Hearing. Staff rec( <br /> by Commissioner Gordon be rev: <br /> further amendments be develop( <br /> amendment. <br /> The Planning Staff proposes ti <br /> to road length to be expanded <br /> minimum average lot size crit( <br /> and to a limit of one (1) sub( <br /> development. This change is <br /> Proposed Amendment. <br /> The Planning Board considered <br /> March 15, 1993 and recommender <br /> RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends <br /> amendment, with the following <br /> 1. Expansion and clarification <br /> criteria related to road le <br /> average lot size criteria o <br /> to a limit of one (1) subdi <br /> development, as recommend( <br /> the Planning Board; and <br /> 2. Revision of the criteria <br /> which the tract is alread <br /> property which completely <br /> than 90% built out. Thi <br /> recommended for purposes <br /> 3 . Clarification that in jus <br /> the lot being subdivided <br /> subdivision, the term "pr <br /> subdivisions approved aft <br /> which private road standa <br /> Orange County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.