Agenda - 05-03-1993 - III-C - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ME MCp,ANDUM Irl' Mary Vi1111S J '—cz- t-s"�V.1 ( oz. from: Alice Crdon ;}U- Subject: Private Road►JustificetionCriteria • 1-tk�Sir C6 c-E-ri,`44' CA.,- 41)KEScGD, hate. March 29, 1993 Thank you for sharing the mete iels concerning the private road sterxdards. 1 have now looked them over and can offer the fullowm comments end sug Irons i eiso apprec+et.eci your telephone call on the subjmt. AO NDA ABSTRACT - peoe 2.second oraar eoh lest santernce,' I would appreciate it if the abstract would reflect the staff intent to address my concerns at the May public hearing, es stated on pixE E of the Planning Bnerrfc 311S/9.3 MinUtw: "Staff recommends that the issue raised by Commissioner Oa,^don corning the creation of latz eking en roc doting privutc rood be reviewed by eleff and any further amendments be re-advertised Icr public he rig i r May." The ouestion that I raised at the hearing is a narrower than you suwest,share it is limited to smell subdivisions, as are the proposed amendments. Because of this limited scope I believe the issue 1 raisol could and should be addressed in May. To summarize, my question is whether any further subdivision can take place in the following situation: Existing subdivision created before the current private road standards of 1988 Only one road in the subdivisionn Access say ving the subdivision is classified as a Class B or Class C rid arcing to the Orange County Private Road Standards. EXISTING AND PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROVISIONS - paves 10 and 1 1 (a) I would suggest that section 7 on pacn 10 be changed by adding (underlined) text es fol lows. 7. There is only one subdivision road proposed and it is classified as either a Class F or Class C rod etzordi nu to the 0ranrn County Private Road Standards. 1 is length dcm not exceed... 1 his change would actress the questions I discussed in our telephone conversation about the number of lots and/or type of road. (I picked up the warding from the partial width right of way section of the subdivision regulations.) (b) On page 1 1 , the third ctmnged paragraph (beginning "Where s pa ci being subdivided ") raises questions about when one starts counting the creation of subdivisions. It appears one needs some starting point, such as a date, in this paragraph to make that clear. (c)On page 1 1 , in the last paragraph, fourth line, the second sentence should be changed to make it gender neutral: "Satisfactory proof will be required by the County Manager or his/her agents." NOTE: At some point the Subdivision Regulations should be chid so that the tot is gender r e6.t r,t e ( fl t yeti (h!s "-f7 ch. r .L�6�� ? 4 4 r c�S ►.... w h � .5 ¢. � 6� I 7� lL�cs�'`�� W e►t bo. ar�x� cc>, TOTAL P.02