Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-1993 - C-1-a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 04-15-1993
>
Agenda - 04-15-1993 - C-1-a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 9:16:52 AM
Creation date
1/17/2017 1:39:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/1993
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-1-a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930415
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Georgann Eubanks: Hogan Lake Rezoning Summation 4 <br /> further determination of the interests of the public need ever be made <br /> before the maximum 574 housing units are built. <br /> Because our objections to this rezoning have met anger and <br /> aspersion, let me emphasize again that we are not attacking the <br /> motivation or the integrity of the Hogans. Nor are we attacking any <br /> proposed pla. i for Lake Hogan Farms, which must remain outside <br /> discussion in this rezoning. Rather, we are asking that you consider <br /> this rezoning under the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and <br /> that you reject it because the applicants have failed to show, through <br /> relevant, solid facts in the public record, that it will not impede the <br /> general health, safety and welfare. <br /> We are not opposed to development. In asking you to deny the <br /> applicants' request, we are not asking you to stop development of <br /> these parcels, and we are not asking you to reject the Lake Hogan <br /> Farms plan. We support a full and open discussion of the Hogans' <br /> concept after a resubmission of this proposal under PUP zoning, <br /> instead of the arbitrary R-R R-20 districts. And we truly hope that, <br /> in a full and open discussion of the applicants' real plans, a <br /> neighborly spirit of communication and compromise will replace the <br /> misunderstanding, distrust and ugliness that has hurt all of us this <br /> time around. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.