Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-24-2007-1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 05-24-2007
>
Agenda - 05-24-2007-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:22:10 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:53:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070524
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~'~ ~ '~ <br />C. ~r ~5 <br />4.~ ~,~ <br />_~. <br />World <br />Class <br />Region <br />Date: <br />To: <br />From: <br /> <br />TRIANG~,E J COl1NCIL OF GOVERNMENTS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />March 16, 2007 <br />Local governments in the Jordan Lake watershed <br />Sydney Miller, Water Resources Program Manager <br />4307 Emperor Boulevard, Suite 110 <br />Durham, NC 27703 <br />Mailing Address: PO Box 12276 <br />Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 <br />919.549.0551 FAX: 919.549.9390 <br />www.tjcog.dst.nc.us <br />Subject: Proposed Jordan Lake nutrient rules dated March 8, 2007 and fiscal analysis dated <br />March 2007 <br />I have read through the latest drafts of the proposed Jordan Reservoir Water Supply Nutrient <br />Rules and Fiscal Analysis: B. Everett Jordan Reservoir Water Supply Nutrient Strategy. Staff at <br />the NC Division of Water Quality has clearly made agood-faith effort to prepare the fiscal <br />analysis. <br />I have prepared some comments, generally from the perspective of local government. Do not <br />construe my comments to represent the opinions of any local governments or their staffs. The <br />opinions in this memorandum are my own. Furthermore, I am certain that I have missed <br />important points within both the rule and the fiscal analysis. Additional reviews would only <br />improve our consideration of the rule and the fiscal analysis. <br />My comments pertain to both the proposed rules and the fiscal analysis. I have included citations <br />within my comments in an abbreviated format. ".026X" refers to a rule within 15A NCAC 02B <br />.0262-.0272. "FA Chapter X" refers to a chapter of the fiscal analysis. <br />1. Watershed Nutrient Reduction Goals -The rule (.0262 (6)(a)) states that "rules .0265, .0266, <br />.0267, .0268, and .0269 shall apply to all incorporated municipalities within the Jordan <br />watershed as identified by the Office of the Secretary of State." However, the rule goes on to <br />state that "those municipalities shall include:" and provides a list of municipalities. The rule <br />should be clarified to indicate that the list is meant only as an example, and that the phrase <br />"shall apply to all municipalities within the Jordan watershed as identified by the Office of <br />the Secretary of State" controls. Newly incorporated municipalities within the Jordan Lake <br />watershed, and municipalities previously outside of the Jordan Lake watershed but that annex <br />property within the Jordan Lake watershed, should become subject to the rule. <br />MISSION STATEMENT <br />To serve as an intergovernmental organization for local elected officials <br />that works proactively an regional issues in order to sustain and improve the quality of life for our citizens. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.