Orange County NC Website
8 <br /> LOG staff for distribution. Consequently, we have not made provisions for <br /> meetings with the LSC for presentation of the results of the geotechnical work. <br /> We do intend, however, to submit the geotechnical investigation report with the <br /> final engineering evaluation report and to present the engineering findings formally <br /> to the LSC in a meeting. <br /> Task Budget <br /> Invoicing for the investigation will be based on the actual quantity of services provided. <br /> Based on the previously described scope of services and Task 11.4 of our contract, we estimate that <br /> the total cost of this investigation will range from $103,840.00 to$121,840.00 The range of the <br /> estimated cost for each site is presented below: <br /> Table Two <br /> TASK BUDGET* <br /> SITE RANGE OF ESTIMATED COSTS <br /> OC-2 $ 30,960.00 to $ 34,960.00 <br /> OC-9 $ 22,960.00 to $ 25,960.00 <br /> OC-11 $ 24,960.00 to $ 32,960.00 <br /> OC-17 $ 24,960.00 to $ 27,960.00 <br /> Totals $103,840.00 to $121,840.00 <br /> *The prices quoted herein are for exploration of all four sites. If the scope <br /> decreases, the drilling costs will increase as follows: <br /> • Exploration limited to one site 15% increase in unit prices <br /> • Exploration limited to two sites 10% increase in unit prices <br /> • Exploration limited to three sites 5% increase in unit prices <br /> We recommend setting a budget of$122,000 for this work, and we agree not to exceed this budget <br /> without your prior authorization. However, as discussed in the Site Access section above, there <br /> are several non-technical issues that may require additional time or services above our stated scope. <br /> This additional time or services would likely result in exceeding the budget of$122,000.00. We <br /> anticipate dealing with these non-technical issues, if they arise, in cooperation with you and your <br /> staff in order to minimize costs. <br /> • Budget Increases - The increases reflected in this budget when compared to the <br /> cost estimate submitted in April 1992 are due to the following items: <br /> 4 __ <br /> w <br /> ..muiror <br /> MEMEMEMEIMINEE <br />