Orange County NC Website
1 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item No. L-C <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: MARCH 23, 1993 <br /> SUBJECT: PAVING PARKING LOTS; SITE WORK FOR BARTOW PROPERTY <br /> DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING AND CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING: YES: NO:XX <br /> ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: <br /> PAM JONES, ext. 2650 <br /> Telephone Number- <br /> Hillsborough 732-8181 <br /> Chapel Hill 967-9251 <br /> Mebane 227-2031 <br /> Durham 688-7331 <br /> PURPOSE: To consider paving the unpaved portions of parking areas on the Downtown Hillsborough <br /> campus; and to consider site work on the property purchased from Ms.Virginia Bartow <br /> in 1990. <br /> BACKGROUND: When the Government Services Center Project was being programmed there was <br /> considerable doubt that the building designed could be built for the funds available. As a result of <br /> the depressed state of the construction industry at the time of bidding, when the bids were actually <br /> received the numbers were considerably more reasonable than what had been anticipated. <br /> During this same period of time, the Town of Hillsborough's Parking Committee was in earnest <br /> discussion about the parking plight of the Town. One of the solutions being seriously discussed was <br /> the construction of a parking deck on the Margaret Lane site. <br /> Primarily due to these two factors, when the Government Services Project was bid, we intentionally <br /> did not include paving the Margaret Lane parking lot. However,we have now completed the project, <br /> including the renovation work at the Tax and Records building,and the project funds available would <br /> in fact support the cost of paving the lot. In a recent meeting,the parking committee endorsed this <br /> action as well. <br /> While the parking lot was "improved" through the course of the project by leveling it and placing <br /> new gravel, it has become obvious that the gravel solution is less than acceptable and that paving <br /> is the obvious alternative. Various options for paving the lot have been discussed and in turn <br /> presented to our project architect. Their response indicates that our interests would best be served <br /> by asphalt paving the lot. <br /> The general contractor will perform the work under his existing contract for an amount not to exceed <br /> $38,138 for the large lot on Margaret Lane and $10,888 for the unpaved area which fronts Churton <br /> Street to the south of the new Courthouse,for a total of $49,026. We originally viewed this second <br /> area as paved, however, a recent inspection of the area shows it to be unacceptable condition. It <br /> is therefore recommended that this area be resurfaced as well. It should further be noted, that the <br /> unit prices upon which the cost of this work is based, were submitted as part of the original bid in <br />