Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-17-2007-WRPMemo
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 05-17-2007
>
Agenda - 05-17-2007-WRPMemo
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 9:25:52 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:50:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/17/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
WRPMemo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
median activities of groundwater exceeded 300 pCi/L in 5 of the 7 hydrogeologic <br />units that were sampled, and two other units of limited extent in the county were <br />not sampled. Additional research and follow-up an these findings are of <br />immediate and critical importance to citizens who live in the parts of the County <br />most affected, and this action should not be delayed any longer.. <br />B. Increased Sampling for Organic Contamination (ERCD, Health) <br />In the aforementioned USGS Study of 2001, no organic contamination was found <br />in the 51 well samples examined. But USGS also concluded that the sample size <br />was small and findings were primarily from recently drilled wells. A larger sample <br />may enable this to be explored to determine whether the study findings are <br />validated in this area. Organic contamination such as BTEX (components of <br />gasoline}, herbicides and pesticides can pose health risks to citizens who ingest <br />water contaminated with these and other compounds. <br />C. Inventory Ground-Water Contamination Incidents (ERCD, Health} <br />Orange County should develop an inventory of ground-water contamination <br />incidents based on county/statelfederal reports (NC DENR, USGS, EPA}. A site <br />check could be conducted to verify locations and potential impacts on ground- <br />water resources and nearby water sources (wells, springs} and surface waters <br />(streams, rivers}. This could also include evaluations of topography, bedrock <br />structure with regard to contaminant migration, and ground-water contamination <br />plume development. A person performing this function could work with State and <br />County Environmental Health staff an follow-up and review of remediation <br />planning and site remediation. This function could also provide information to <br />residentsldevelopers, county departments and other county officials about <br />potential far contamination of existing wells or planned wells. <br />Issue 3. Resource Evaluation, Public Service and Education <br />There have been a number of occasions over the past decades when additional <br />information provided by a County water resources expert would have provided <br />useful data on water supplies, bath for local decisions-making and as a resource <br />far the public. Thus, the Water Resources Initiative proposes that the County <br />provide a valuable service to its citizens to full/ a need that is currently unmet, <br />as outlined below, <br />A. Well Siting and Construction (ERCD, Health, Planning, Engineer) <br />Over the years, many questions have arisen about the best place to drill wells <br />and about methods to maximize ground-water yield. While many of these <br />questions are only answerable on a case-by-case basis due to the County's <br />underlying geology, there is some information that can be made available to <br />assist citizens in planning far new wells. A resource person to informlassist <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.