Agenda - 02-16-1993 - VII-A - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ASSUM §ONCE= • Remaining land has soil equally distributed among Poor, Fair, and Good (33% each). • Under option IA, 26% of lend will be developed with en open apace option, equally distributed among the 8 options (except for the last two). • Under option 28, with the conventional one-acre option available, there's less incentive to onoose open space: only 18% of land will be developed with an open space option, equally distributed among the nine possible combinations of open space quality and soil condition, • Under option 3B, 30% of land will be developed under open space, as the relative incentive is higher (with the conventional one-acre option no longer avellebie), • Under option 49, 38% of land will be developed under open space, as the bonuses are higher, RESULTS (see graph): Option 9 A results in a 46% increase In population with new open space at 11%. Option 28 results In slightly lower population increase than 1 A, and lower new open space. The high population of conventional one-acre development Is offset by lower bonuses for open apace development, (Is there proper incentive for Open Space development here?) Option 36 is elrnost "population neutral", and provides 12% new open space. Option 46 has an 11% Increase in population, with 14% open space. CONCLUSION: Perhaps a plan between 39 and 413, where: • The density le based on yield (like 20) • Maximum base yield Is 2-acre lots (a RCS conclusion) • Proper Incentives are given for Open Space development • expected population change Is minimal (population neutral) PA-64r 2 J