Agenda - 02-16-1993 - VII-A - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

59 h IS Stancil referred to the summary sheet (page 91 of � agenda materials) , and reviewed and explained the 9 ) � p changes from the November 23 , 1992 package. A copy of this summary is an attachment to these minutes on page There were also some changes to the definition of open space. Those changes are indicated in bold print on pages 23 and 24 of the final version of the Conceptual Guidelines document which is on. file in the Planning Department. Stancil reviewed and explained the changes in the definition. , Stancil referred to position statements from Livy Ludington and Dolly Hunter. These statements are attachments to these minutes on pages The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Rural Character strategies as adopted by the Rural Character Study Committee. The documents referred to in this item are all on file in the Planning Department . MOTION: Scott moved to accept the Rural Orange Guidelines but retain the current 40, 000 square foot minimum lot size which does not have an open space requirement. Seconded by Eidenier. Waddell expressed concern with asking developers to submit two concept plans as stated under Development Option 2 - Conventional Two-Acre Lot Development which states : Therefore, to provide opportunities for property owners and developers to visualize the possibilities of open-space development, it is recommended that all conventional development projects under Option 2 creating more than 15 residential lots/units must submit two concept plans for subdivision: ( 1) a conventional subdivision plan under the appropriate option, and (2 ) an open-space subdivision plan under one of the open-space development styles . The choice of development style would be voluntary for the property owner/developer. Waddell noted that it seemed to be just another costly burden on the developer. Stancil responded that the Committee had discussed the cost and that was the reason for requiring it