Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - VII-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - VII-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 4:41:44 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 4:25:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930216
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
32 <br /> 1-21-93 Final Version <br /> SECTION III. DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FOR RURAL ORANGE <br /> FINDING THE APPROPRIATE "BALANCE" <br /> A number of action strategies for the protection of rural character <br /> have been recommended above. The common denominator for all is a <br /> focus on balancing land development impacts on agriculture, natural <br /> and visual resources, and managed growth. In seeking to achieve <br /> this balance, a difficult conflict arises between the often- <br /> competing values of "land as a natural resource" and "land as a <br /> commodity" . However, land development and rural character <br /> protection need not be mutually exclusive. In some locales across <br /> the nation, development styles have been adapted to serve both the <br /> right to develop land and the need to preserve traditional rural <br /> landscapes, resources, and ways of life. <br /> This balance becomes most critical in areas where development and <br /> growth pressures are strong. As part of the Research Triangle, <br /> Orange County is inexorably linked to the positive and negative <br /> components of growth. This linkage to the Triangle offers a healthy <br /> regional economy and a good quality of life. However, these same <br /> factors make Orange County and the Triangle area magnets for growth <br /> and a highly-mobile labor force. <br /> This magnet effect can be seen in the population growth of Orange <br /> County over the past 50 years. In 1940, as the Great Depression <br /> ended, the County contained 23,072 persons - gaining less than 2000 <br /> persons since 1920. By 1960, the population had nearly doubled to <br /> 42, 970. The decades of the 60 's and 70 's saw the most dramatic <br /> population growth in the County's history, yielding a 1980 <br /> population of 77 ,055 . In 1992, the County population is nearing the <br /> 100, 000 mark, with a current estimated population of 97 , 000. In <br /> this 50-year period, the County grew by an annual rate of almost 3% <br /> per year - a remarkable rate for such a lengthy period. While <br /> population growth has slowed somewhat in the late 80 's and early <br /> 90 's, long-term trends indicate the County population will continue <br /> to rise at a significant rate, with an additional 15-20, 000 persons <br /> expected by the end of this decade. <br /> Counties and regions across the nation that have developed programs <br /> to balance rural character and development rights have, like Orange <br /> County, been on the edge of an urbanizing region. The challenge for <br /> such jurisdictions is to find development styles that do not <br /> compromise agricultural or natural resources and visual resources. <br /> In almost every case where a rural character program has been <br /> implemented, open-space development and a means of purchasing or <br /> transferring development rights have been key components, and have <br /> led to higher values for properties in open-space rather than <br /> conventional subdivisions . <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.