Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - III-F
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - III-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 4:21:33 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 4:20:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930216
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
24 <br /> 7 <br /> 1 stated he has written a number of articles on Land Use strategies. He stated <br /> 2 he does not understand the information that backs up this amendment request. <br /> 3 If the information is flawed, can the Board of County Commissioners vote on <br /> 4 it. He pointed out several contradictions in the background information. <br /> 5 On page 195, the information indicates that 258 children will be generated <br /> 6 by this project while on page 303 the information indicates there will be 345 <br /> 7_ school age children generated by this project. On page 245, the developers <br /> 8 say there will be over 1, 000 children living in this project. On page 248 <br /> 9 the developer indicates there will be 6700 average traffic trips generated. <br /> 10 On page 255, the information indicates there will be 9, 431. On page 301 it <br /> 11 says that the average price of a home in this development will be $159 , 944 . <br /> 12 He noted that there is no evidence presented in the background information <br /> 13 to merit a favorable vote by the Board of County Commissioners to designate <br /> 14 this project as open space. The amendment was changed in the middle from <br /> 15 Ten-Year Transition to Ten-Year Transition or Open Space transition. <br /> 16 ALLEN SPALT, Director of the Agricultural Resources Center in Carrboro, <br /> 17 read a statement which has been made a part of the record of this meeting by <br /> 18 reference. In summary, he stated that he supports planned communities but <br /> 19 saying that this kind of development will preserve Rural Character and is <br /> 20 consistent with the kind of density thats allowed is just not right. He <br /> 21 feels that a golf course is not open space but more like a medium on a <br /> 22 freeway counting the grassed area as open space. Active open space should <br /> 23 not count the same way as a field. Responsibly managed gold courses are not <br /> 24 toxic waste dumps and their environmental affects should not be exaggerated. <br /> 25 But neither are they benign or neutral. They have been a source of serious <br /> 26 problems affecting water quality, wildlife and human health primarily from <br /> 27 the heavy use of pesticides. He presented some written information on the <br /> 28 affects of golf courses and other articles. <br /> 29 PETER PICKENS read a statement which has been made a part of the record <br /> 30 of this meeting by reference. He is against any rezoning of this part of <br /> 31 rural Orange County which would allow a development such as University <br /> 32 Station to be built. He objects to the apartments, townhouses and <br /> 33 condominiums planned for this development. He is opposed to the whole <br /> 34 village concept of University Station. He would be very surprised if <br /> 35 University Station doesn't have urban restrictive covenants, which will not <br /> 36 allow livestock such as horses or perhaps chickens. He feels that the <br /> 37 developments built in rural areas should themselves have rural character with <br /> 38 rural covenants, which would give residents the option, the alternative, the <br /> 39 freedom to live and pursue a country life in those rural areas. He asks the <br /> 40 Board of County Commissioners to do whats best for rural Orange County and <br /> 41 not to change the zoning from Rural Residential to Ten-Year Transition or <br /> 42 Open Space Development Area and not to approve the proposed University <br /> 43 Station project. <br /> 44 LEE RAFALOW read a statement which has been made a part of the record of <br /> 45 this meeting by reference. In summary he made reference to the comments Mr. <br /> 46 Kenan and Mr. Cogswell made at the last public hearing _-on December 1 and <br /> 47 indicated that a lot of people know about risk. His vision is that of a <br /> 48 density neutral development that does not distort the concept of preserving <br /> 49 open space and rural character. He feels that the developers will transform <br /> 50 their homes into urban sprawl and ruin the quality of life for which they <br /> 51 have all worked so hard. He asked the Board of County Commissioners to help <br /> 52 the citizens implement an alternative to urban sprawl. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.