Orange County NC Website
21 <br /> 4 <br /> 1 A. SOLDI lives adjacent to the proposed University Station development. <br /> 2 He expressed a concern for the natural habitat and the streams. He realizes <br /> 3 there is a conflict between growth and sound development while still <br /> 4 preserving as much farmland as possible. He urged the Board of County <br /> 5 Commissioners to give preference to development that trades open space and <br /> 6 even better natural habitats for higher density developments. By increasing <br /> 7 densities in some places, it relieves the pressure for using more and more <br /> 8 land as well. If the Board of County Commissioners approve this project he <br /> 9 asked that more evidence be presented to assure affordable housing and that <br /> 10 the construction schedule be carried out so that they is little disruption <br /> it to animals and vegetation. <br /> 12 JOE HAKEN, Chairman of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, <br /> 13 stated that his Board requests that the Board of County Commissioners <br /> 14 consider any plan which has diversity of housing included in it. He feels <br /> 15 that it is important to provide an opportunity for people who work in Orange <br /> 16 County to live in Orange County. The Chamber assumes that the developers <br /> 17 will take care of the environment, traffic and other issues which have been <br /> 18 brought forth by the citizens. <br /> 19 JANE MASKE distributed a newspaper article entitled "Study links <br /> 20 leukemia., chemical contact" . She stated that she feels the information given <br /> 21 at the last meeting by Mr. Cogswell, the developer, about the safety of <br /> 22 toxins on golf courses was erroneous and that low levels of toxins are <br /> 23 dangerous. She spoke to the issue of risk indicating that there are other <br /> 24 than financial risks at stake like health and well being. She is opposed to <br /> 25 the proposed University Station high density village. She feels that this <br /> 26 village can destroy the rural character of this area, destroy the wildlife <br /> 27 and create an unbelievable traffic situation and dilute the quality education <br /> 28 by overcrowding the schools. <br /> 29 JENNIFER MILLER read a statement which has been made a part of the record <br /> 30 of this meeting by reference. She presented information on the detrimental <br /> 31 effect that the proposed University Station development would have on Orange <br /> 32 County schools. In her statement she list sixteen errors in the new school <br /> 33 impact study presented by Planning Director Marvin Collins. She feels that <br /> 34 the strain of a new town on the schools, combined with strains on public <br /> 35 safety, roads and water quality, constitute a cumulative and predictable <br /> 36 impact, sufficient to cause the Board of County Commissioners to deny the <br /> 37 petition that is before them to amend the Land Use Plan. The impact on New <br /> 38 Hope Elementary will be the equivalent of one new classroom each year. <br /> 39 GREGG FRAHELY spoke against the proposed University Station development. <br /> 40 This area has a great potential for development within the next forty or <br /> 41 fifty years. He feels there is a loophole in the proposed rural village <br /> 42 concept. That loophole allows developers to call golf courses open space. <br /> 43 He would like to see true open space -- true rural character written into the <br /> 94 code and not allow wetlands or golf courses to be included in that category. <br /> 45 This would allow the growth to be managed and not turned into a golf course <br /> 46 community. _ <br /> 47 BILL STROM presented two maps which showed the proposed open space area <br /> 48 and water and sewer lines. He read a statement which has been made a part <br /> 49 of the record of this meeting by reference. He feels that questions about <br /> 50 providing water and sewer to this proposed development have not been <br /> 51 adequately addressed. The proposed University Station plan does not meet any <br /> 52 of the four stated objectives of the Rural Character study. He feels it is <br />