Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - III-F
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - III-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 4:21:33 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 4:20:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930216
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 5 <br /> Character Strategies and Open Space Strategies are the same. Actually all the <br /> strategies would be available in the Cooperative Planning Area. <br /> Chair Carey asked for suggestions on a date to continue this public <br /> hearing and it was decided that this public hearing would be continued on <br /> December 14 , 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. in Superior Courtroom in Hillsborough, North <br /> Carolina. <br /> COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE <br /> Callie Warner stated that the choice is between staying within the <br /> current zoning and do cluster Open Space Developments and save portions of the <br /> rural character while addressing the needs or go to a category which will <br /> bring in higher density and water and sewer. She feels that this plan has <br /> been presented to the public as a great alternative to the one house per acre <br /> development and a statement as to what can be done in Orange County. She <br /> thinks it is something that has generated a lot of concern. She introduced <br /> Randall Arendt who has had 20 years of experience in rural planning with <br /> emphasis on blending, conservation and development. He is co-author of <br /> Dealing With Chanae. <br /> Randall Arendt stated that he thinks the University Station plan <br /> represents a tremendous amount of site analysis and thought and represents the <br /> work of a lot of people but the logic is based on the wrong premise and that <br /> no matter how good the analysis is, from then on it is flawed. He addressed <br /> the three areas of density, sewer service and open space. Mr. Arendt stated <br /> that offering 67% density bonus and extending sewer lines to protect open <br /> space is like building a highway to relieve traffic congestion. The solutions <br /> cause growth. He stated that density bonuses have been seen for a long time <br /> as a way of encouraging developers to do better site design, but maybe the <br /> solution is to write design standards in the ordinances so that better design <br /> is part of the package the developers normally do and density bonuses are then <br /> not necessary. He made reference to a planning document called "Rural Orange <br /> Buildout Analysis" dated January, 1992 . That document indicates that in the <br /> rural area in 1990, there were less than 20, 000 people. The buildout of rural <br /> Orange when the unbuildable areas are deleted is 130, 000 without any density <br /> bonuses. He showed some slides of Farmview which is a development on 430 <br /> acres in an area with 1 acre zoning located within easy commuting distance of <br /> Philadelphia. Of this 430 acres, 130 were wet woods. This left 300 acres for <br /> 300 lots. The developer asked that he be allowed to build these 300 homes on <br /> 150 acres leaving 150 acres of farmland which he donated to the local land <br /> trust. This ended up to be the fastest selling development in this area. Not <br /> only are density bonuses necessary but so are public sewer line extensions. <br /> One alternative is land treatment of reclaimed wastewater land application. <br /> This would avoid the need for expensive sewer connections. A publicly <br /> financed sewer line encourages growth. Mr. Arendt's third point is the <br /> definition of open space. He recommends clustering on 50% of the buildable <br /> land to reserve the other half as permanent open space. He doesn't count <br /> unbuildable wetlands or floodplains or steep slopes, power line easements, <br /> road rights-of-way, storm retention basins or parking lots as contributing <br /> toward open space requirements. But he feels that in this very creative <br /> University Station plan, one of the creative aspects is how much of these <br /> power line easements and retention basins and golf courses could be counted - <br /> as open space. A highly developed intensively managed active recreational <br /> plan should definitely count toward open space, but should not count for any <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.