Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - III-E
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993
>
Agenda - 02-16-1993 - III-E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 4:31:19 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 4:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930216
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U jj 24 <br /> included in the Declaration for the major that <br /> will demonstrate their consent to the division of <br /> Mincey Farm. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> Concept Plan for Mincey Farm Subdivision with <br /> public roads built to State standards and the <br /> conditions contained in the Resolution of <br /> Approval (a copy is an attachment to these <br /> minutes on pages ) . <br /> Eidenier asked what would happen if one of the <br /> property owners of the minor subdivision lots <br /> did not wish to see further subdivision and <br /> refused to sign the statement . Cameron responded <br /> that would be a condition that could not be met <br /> by the applicant, thus, preliminary approval <br /> would expire. <br /> Eidenier asked if there are any existing <br /> dwellings on these lots or the other minor <br /> subdivision lots . Cameron responded no. <br /> Burklin asked the size of lots B, C, and D. <br /> Cameron responded that those lots are probably <br /> two to three acres in size. <br /> Eidenier asked if there would be any possibility <br /> of access to Latta Road through lot D. Cameron <br /> responded that Latta Road parallels the tract and <br /> then curves behind it. She continued that there <br /> is an easement from Latta Road at the back of <br /> this property that allows access to two land- <br /> locked parcels . <br /> Burklin asked if Cameron had investigated the wet <br /> weather drain. Cameron responded that it was a <br /> gradual grass swale. There is no channel. It is <br /> to accommodate any outflow from the pond. She <br /> noted that Erosion Control is requiring a 30-foot <br /> drainage easement along the swale crossing lots <br /> A5 and E3 through E6 . Burklin asked if it would <br /> affect construction on lot E6. Waddell asked if <br /> construction on E5 would be affected. Eidenier <br /> asked about access to E4 . The response <br /> was no. Cameron emphasized again that it was a <br /> gradual grass swale. She indicated she felt <br /> there would be no problems with construction <br /> sites or driveways. She also noted that the plat <br /> had been approved by Environmental Health. <br /> MOTION: Waddell moved approval as recommended by the <br /> Planning Staff. Seconded by Scott. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.