Agenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-G - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

23 6. Eaual Opportunity Statement: a signed Equal Opportunity Statement or equivalent. G. EVALUATION OF APPLICATIONS Applications will receive comprehensive review by a DAH Review Committee, after which recommendations will be made to the SHPO. The state shall make available, upon request, the rationale for applicants selected and the amounts awarded. Project selection will be based on the following criteria: 1. Assessment of Need The application should contain a brief description of the problems and opportunities affecting the historic resources in the community. The statement may be supported by evidence, such as statistics or advice from community groups. The assessment of need should indicate how the project will relate to community problems. The proposed solution should be workable - something which can be accomplished within a reasonable period and with reasonable resources. 2. Design of Project The project description should include clearly stated and specific goals that are realistically attainable within the funding period. Applications should also demonstrate an understanding of state and local preservation priorities including efforts to advance the identification, evaluation and protection of the state's historic and prehistoric resources. 3 . Project Cost The application should include a feasible project cost, combining the requested CLG grant funds and available non-federal matching monies and in-kind services. Demonstrated community support and financial commitment from the local government may also be indicated. Previous HPF grant awards should be listed, including any previous CLG funds. 4. Impact The application should identify the impact of the project on the local community, including direct and spin-off results. Consideration will also be given to the contribution of project activities on issues identified 'in the preservation planning process being conducted by the DAH. 4