Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-G
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 01-19-1993
>
Agenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 3:52:53 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 3:36:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/19/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930119
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> 1. The .SHPO shall receive completed NRNs. <br /> 2. If a property to be nominated lies within the <br /> jurisdiction of a CLG, the HPO shall transmit copies <br /> of the nomination to the local historic preservation <br /> commission and the chief local elected official <br /> within thirty (30) days after the HPO has determined <br /> that the nomination is complete and accurate and at <br /> least sixty (60) days prior to consideration by the <br /> State Professional Review Committee (SPRC) . <br /> 3 . Concurrently, the HPO shall notify the property <br /> owner(s) that the nomination has been completed. <br /> 4. The local historic preservation commission and the <br /> chief local elected official, the latter acting on <br /> behalf of the local governing board, shall <br /> separately notify the SHPO and the applicant as to <br /> their opinions in regard to the proposed nomination <br /> within sixty (60) days of receipt of the nomination <br /> materials. If the CLG does not respond within <br /> sixty (60) days, approval of the nomination will be <br /> assumed. With the concurrence of the CLG, the SHPO <br /> may specify a briefer review period in order to <br /> expedite the nomination process. <br /> 5. When a commission considers a NRN for a resource <br /> (such as an archaeological site, or a building or <br /> district possessing historical and/or architectural <br /> significance) , which is normally evaluated by a <br /> professional in a specific discipline (such as an <br /> archaeologist, architect or architectural historian, <br /> or historian) and that discipline is not represented <br /> on the commission, the commission shall seek <br /> expertise in this area before rendering its <br /> decision. When considering nominations in such <br /> cases, the commission is encouraged to seek the <br /> assistance of professionals in the community or <br /> lAlthough the federal regulations governing the CLG program <br /> call for the chief local elected official to provide comments <br /> on proposed NRNs within the. jurisdiction of a CLG, North <br /> Carolina law stipulates that the mayor or chairman of the <br /> board of county commissioners may act only in an <br /> administrative capacity on behalf of the local governing <br /> board. If a CLG has doubts about the legality of the chief <br /> elected official assuming sole responsibility for comments on <br /> proposed NRNs, it may wish to consider two alternatives: 1) <br /> having the governing board review each nomination; or 2) <br /> having the governing board pass a resolution granting the <br /> chief elected official the authority to furnish comments on <br /> • behalf of the governing board. The SHPO shall provide CLGs <br /> with the wording for such a resolution upon request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.