Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-G
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 01-19-1993
>
Agenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 3:52:53 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 3:36:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/19/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930119
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
) 99 <br /> 16 G' <br /> d. The local government violates specific <br /> agreements (i.e. Memorandums of Agreement <br /> between the HPO, the local government, and <br /> the Advisory Council on Historic <br /> Preservation) . <br /> e. The local government fails to coordinate <br /> its responsibilities with the HPO. <br /> 2. Termination of Grant Assistance <br /> The SHPO may terminate financial assistance in <br /> accordance with the National Register Programs <br /> Manual when a local government is decertified. The <br /> SHPO may then proceed as circumstances warrant to <br /> ensure completion of a project funded with this <br /> assistance. <br /> 3 . Requests for Recertification <br /> Upon decertification, a local government may <br /> immediately request recertification. However, the <br /> local government will lose eligibility to apply for <br /> matching funds during the grant cycle following <br /> decertification whether or not its recertification <br /> request is approved. <br /> 4 . Voluntary Decertification <br /> A CLG may petition the SHPO to be decertified <br /> voluntarily and without prejudice. <br /> VI. PARTICIPATION OF CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS <br /> IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATIONS PROCESS <br /> In accordance with the National Historic Preservation <br /> Amendments Act of 1980, the CLG shall submit comments to the <br /> HPO regarding the eligibility of each property or district <br /> within its jurisdiction which is proposed for nomination to <br /> the NRHP. These comments shall contain the evaluation of the <br /> property according to NRHP criteria by the local historic <br /> preservation commission and the chief local elected official, <br /> the latter acting on behalf of the local governing board. The <br /> comments may be as simple as affirmative statements that, in <br /> their opinion, the property is eligible. Local governing <br /> boards and local commissions are encouraged to submit any <br /> other comments they feel are relevant. Comments may be <br /> submitted on forms provided by the HPO. If the chief local <br /> elected official and the local historic preservation <br /> commission agree that the property does not met NRHP criteria, <br /> the commission shall submit a finding indicating how it does <br /> not. The CLG will be involved in the NRN process in the <br /> following manner: <br /> 1 � <br /> . F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.