Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-H
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Agenda - 01-19-1993
>
Agenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-H
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 3:59:18 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 3:35:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/19/1993
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19930119
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Character of Resources <br /> The landscape of Chapel Hill Township is often strikingly beautiful because of <br /> the steep, rocky terrain. The township is rapidly suburbanizing as new roads • <br /> are cut into the woods and new houses are built, however, the effect is not as <br /> detrimental as in many other suburban areas because many of the new develop- <br /> ments respect the terrain and many of the lots are large. <br /> Although this report is based on visual evidence and oral history, a summary of <br /> the historical composition of the county drawn from secondary sources is help- <br /> ful in evaluating visual and oral evidence.1 Orange County in the 1850s was a <br /> county containing an extremely stable population of settlers who had emigrated <br /> into the area in the 18th century. They were largely Scotch-Irish and Germans <br /> who emigrated from Pennsylvania and English settlers who had emigrated from <br /> Virginia. The county was typical of the upland South, with a population com- <br /> posed largely of yeoman farming families. In 1860, 59% of the white male <br /> heads of households owned no land, and 71 .5% of them owned no slaves. <br /> Thirty-three percent of the white male household heads owned between one <br /> and 250 acres and 21 .6% owned between one and nine slaves. Kinship was <br /> more important than class in Orange County, for succeeding generations settled <br /> adjacent to each other in ever growing neighborhoods that were extremely <br /> stable. By the 1850s the county was extensively but thinly settled, with one <br /> family for each 200 acres of land. In reality, families lived closer than this, <br /> along creeks and rivers and in neighborhood clusters. <br /> The initial reconaissance survey of Chapel Hill Township revealed very few his- <br /> toric buildings, for we were driving the paved county roads, and few historic <br /> houses stood on these roads. We were therefore surprised to find that there <br /> were many more early buildings standing in the township than we had ex- <br /> pected. These buildings were located on dirt roads, often one quarter to one- <br /> half mile from the present road. We discovered that, prior to the early twentieth <br /> century, farms in the township were linked by dirt paths that zigzagged from <br /> one farm to another. In the early twentieth century the public roads were laid <br /> out in more or less straight orientations between the rows of farms, leaving the <br /> farmhouses sitting well-back from the new roads on long dirt driveways. <br /> Another surprising discovery about the historic buildings of the township is that <br /> almost one-third of the pre-1940 buildings are one-room log houses built be- <br /> tween ca. 1810 and ca. 1905. This is a higher incidence of log building than <br /> we expected. Fewer antebellum frame buildings were found than we expected. <br /> The township was apparently composed primarily of small subsistence farms <br /> throughout the nineteenth century. The farmers built their houses out of avail- <br /> able materials, with the help of neighbors. Perhaps most remarkable is the fact <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.