Orange County NC Website
6 <br /> The Role of LOG <br /> 1. W hat is the purpose of the LOG? <br /> Is it (or should It be) a solid waste utility? <br /> II. What should the role of LOG be in decision making? <br /> is LOG like one of our advisory Boards? <br /> or perhaps more like OWASA? <br /> III. How should the LOG change in light of the changes <br /> in the nature of solid waste management and planning <br /> since its inception? <br /> Structure and composition of the.LOG <br /> I. Is there a better way to resolve differences of opinion <br /> among the three governing boards? <br /> H Should we have more people on the LOG? <br /> more elected officials? _ <br /> private citizens? <br /> ex-officio town board representatives? <br /> III. What role should Hillsborough play? <br /> IV. Does the LOG operate efficiently in terms of staff time <br /> and costs? <br /> LOG Funding <br /> I. Are the LOG's two functions at odds with one another <br /> if the LOG's budget is dependent on waste entering <br /> the landfill is it possible for LOG to also actively <br /> attempt to prevent waste from entering the landfill? <br /> do we need to split the LOG into two different boards? <br /> Role of the LOG staff <br /> I. What is the relationship of the town (or the county) staff to <br /> the LOG? <br /> IL What is the role of LOG staff in developing policy? <br /> Odds and ends <br /> I. How can we overcome a lack of accountability to the <br /> public (perceived or real)? <br /> Ii. Is the proposed new name acceptible? <br /> is ISWAC fundamentally harder to say than LOG? <br /> will OWASA be jealous of a new 5 letter accronym? <br /> • <br />