Orange County NC Website
3. Penalties <br /> Any person convicted of knowingly and willfully violating the Anti-kickback Statute shall be <br /> found guilty of a felony, and fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 <br /> years, or both, for each violation. Violators of the Anti-kickback Statute also are subject to <br /> exclusion from the federal health care programs upon a determination of a violation by the <br /> Secretary of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), regardless of whether a criminal <br /> conviction has been obtained. In addition, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 grants the <br /> Secretary of HHS new authority to impose civil monetary penalties for each violation of the <br /> Anti-kickback Statute of: <br /> a. up to $50,000; and <br /> b. three times the amount of the remuneration in question. <br /> B. Safe Harbors and Exceptions <br /> 1 . Overview <br /> The Anti-kickback Statute includes limited statutory exceptions for certain fmancial <br /> arrangements, specifically an exception for employment arrangements and discounts. <br /> Additionally, the Department of Health and Human Services ("DHHS") has promulgated <br /> regulations,teliued "safe harbors," specifying certain payment practices that are excepted <br /> from the prohibitions of the Anti-kickback Statute. 42 C.F.R. § 1001.952, et. seq. However, <br /> the protection afforded by the safe harbor regulations is limited to very narrow <br /> circumstances. Paragraphs 2 through 7 below describe some of the statutory and regulatory <br /> safe harbors most pertinent to NSMT. <br /> 2. The Statutory Exception For Employment Arrangements and the Employment Safe Harbor <br /> The Anti-kickback Statute includes a statutory exception for "any amount paid by an employer <br /> to an employee (who has a bona fide employment relationship with such employer) for <br /> employment in the provision of covered items or services." Specifically, the safe harbors <br /> provide that the term "employee" has the same meaning as it does for purposes of 26 U.S.C. <br /> 3121(d) (2),which adopts the "usual common law rules." Nevertheless, DHHS also considers <br /> the purpose of the employment, the amount paid for the service, and whether• services were <br /> performed, in assessing the employment relationship, and might be expected to challenge <br /> "sham" employment arrangements despite the arguably blanket <br /> protection of this exception. <br /> 3. The Statutory Exception for Discounts and the Discount Safe Harbor <br /> The Anti-kickback Statute includes a statutory exception for "a discount or other reduction in <br /> price obtained by a provider of services or other entity under a federal healthcare program if the <br /> reduction in price is properly disclosed and appropriately reflected in the costs claimed or <br /> charges made by the provider or entity." The discount safe harbor regulation narrows the <br /> statutory exception through its restrictive definition of the word "discount". The discount safe <br /> harbor also prescribes specific disclosure standards for different categories of purchasers. <br /> 18 <br />