Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-17-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 03-17-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 1:51:45 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 3:17:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/1982
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820317
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
!„.6,.%1171111WIIIII40* <br /> • t#1.V047,1k,, <br /> 'i••■ <br /> • <br /> . • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> P .Sege3 5 1, 1d91 utes <br /> 8; <br /> Wig oornnen.ted that he saw a problem with this recaTtrendati <br /> in that it proposed to give sate of the lake Oran water to <br /> the Orange-A3.arnance Water Systems which was pumping it out of <br /> , <br /> the Muse Basin to Mbane, a conflict with recannandation' <br /> =ter me. <br /> Wils aeked why the water supply far Hillsborough deareawd <br /> with tiMe. Luce replied that it was because of the withdrawa3 <br /> upstream at C.o.rporation lake. <br /> Kizer motitried apprOVal* Of the sea id recOnifndtion Of the <br /> Water Task Farce. Cleary teccrded Vicrtion. carried with 4 in <br /> Reoonirrelidationfavcir, 3 againsto3and Baca% t <br /> and .asilo abstaining. <br /> Water motion in receiving and withdrawal basins. <br /> Luce described OrAskis water oonservat.ion plan, He said there <br /> was no sa • lan in place for northern Orange. <br /> Kizer in:timed .approval of the recomnendatibn. Laszlo seconded <br /> Approved unanimusly. <br /> Recarrrendatio' n #4 <br /> Identification of prin reservoir sites, <br /> Luce described the criteria which we.re used in selecting the th <br /> prirre reservoir sites front among the tweny-nine Ixrtential siteE, <br /> identified in the report. <br /> Kizer questioned why only five sites 1,ere selected. Izvir' noted <br /> that industrial developnent in and around HiLlsborqugh could <br /> cause a great demand for water in the future: <br /> Kizer motioned that reconnendation number four be accepted but <br /> that in addition sites 17 and 18 in the report can the north and <br /> south forks of the Little River be included as protected sites. <br /> ... Irvin second , <br /> Luce noted that the five sites identified in the Report ate <br /> within protected watersheds. The protection of the new <br /> sites would require that additional areas of` 44 r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.