Orange County NC Website
Cheeks Township Advisory Council,Minutes <br /> September 15, 1981. <br /> Page 2 <br /> Lindsay Efland suggested that the area of concern lay between. US 70 and 1-85_ <br /> He felt industrial. and higher density residential uses should be allowed in <br /> that area. He:asked if a good argument could be made for keeping those uses <br /> out of the area. Line respcsidad that the basin line was a factor. Viand <br /> added that people's feelings and political matters were also factors. <br /> Lucie clarified a that the Task Force was, with, water,quality a..' a_it <br /> was'assumed that'so�ne`nr>d eatiori of`tie .m iidations for greater accepter <br /> • bility would be mach during the public,i c,hearing- • • <br /> 'David Shankl i n' agreed that th° Interstate should be the dividing line;rather <br /> than the ra trade r.- <br /> • <br /> Luce clarified the comproraise made by the Task Farm allowing deVelnputt in <br /> McGowan Creek sub-basin, but not in Seven Mile Creek sub-basin. <br /> Shankli'n pointed out:. that the recoirmendation reed a five acre mininium'with <br /> a reduction to a two acre minium only if stornwater management reasures were <br /> in place.. He added this could d be very expensive.. <br /> *alter McDade emphasized that one known major water quality 1rohlem source was <br /> the malfunctions L septic-systems in,the watershed. Luce responded that the <br /> John Ivicklams Ccapany was•doing a study'to determine-passible solutions to the <br /> problem -in the Efland Estates area.. McDade reenphasize'.d that the County knaaa <br /> • about-the problem and the solutia L ie_sauces linesr but is not addressing it an <br /> terms of water quality protection. 14.$. Allison added that water quality <br /> protection cannot be accomplished without addressing this problem. McDade <br /> recomarended. that the County extend sewer lines before they rtsider mi,runnlrn <br /> lot sizes in the watershed to reduce the possibility of sewage getting into the <br /> waexshed. . He noted this concern is .based on the amity residents being <br /> both.tax payers-and:-landowners who ae conaarned-about the present situation.- <br /> and tke futures situatiirrfor their- • <br /> rats cittd t piw�hlem:wi y -and potentially malfuncticning <br /> . <br /> McDade empbasizeci addilas in4 the preSent. problem along with contidertrig lxrig <br /> -rand plans for quality protection.Deviti Cobb indicated that the Efland. <br /> Estates cxxrmcnity was.asking for help how: .7' <br /> Luce noted that sewage•'is only one source of pollution. John Puller distingu►si <br /> between accidental. chemical spills as opposed t o controllable sewage:problems. <br /> Lindsay Efland agreed that the sewage problem was a day to day concern. <br />