Agenda - 03-17-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

: :':-':: ., '-• :,'.: , : a ' • , •,•■■•••1*I Ir. . .. ' • *ii Chapel Hill Township AdvisOry Council . • . Septernter 8, 1981 _ . Page 5 - .. . . '.:.?.` . --i, . . , . . . Dr. Bennett felt that 90% of salt, &nes from farms, not construction and that the ordinance would not affect the main source of this pollutant. Luce-respOrt4 that the SCS does encourage and assist in formulating management plans for fact on a voluntary basis. . , , . Bennett indicated it would be go:d to recognize fatm sources even if tlie issue was a touchy one, and encourage cooperation with the program. Luce responded t the second part of the ration addresws the subject of cooperation. He ' cited the SCS program for portions of the Back Creek Reservoir. pes grogram calls for special measures to reduce erosion before t1 reservoir is built. ne ' added that =eh of the silt in University Lake occurred trout earlier Lana prac- tices and suggested that similar measures be imPlemented far Cane Creek prio' r t the Wilding of the proposed reservoir. . . . . RecOmmendation #17: . . . , . ., ' . . . . . Dr. Bennett cited that soil bacteria will facilitate the degradation of PCS's, but did not know how much gets into the water prior to this actin. . . - , . .. - taimaL cam= . . . . • • • . .. . . Dr. Bennett mile a number of points regarding the Task Force Report. Thaw Anc —0 That the report needed to be inplemented for public benefit; . . , . o ghat adverse impacts On existing property croziers should be considered; o.. That small lot property owners should be reassured of their possession . use of the land; - : . ,. o That residen ts of the township should be informed about how the reconrce: tions proposed address problems affecting local water supplies, not jus urban area water supplies. - , Mr Smith ez.rpres6ed 6einOein. 'regirding the ailVerte impacts'of the iitpleirentation 7 the loft size_iestrictions..on nyny:4,andowners.-:,Re...indicated .,the,t:earlandcto er ,-----:: -- e-Witer-Sher3:.:i0:5uld.--be. for o --tucec:lari.fied.that prObleias-Wi5n1d-arise • ' ' if they wanes ta subdivide their small land holdings. Smith cited'a situatic':n a grandfatter -desiring- to equally divide his land among eight childEen.. Luce i that the proposed lot size may make the land more valuable. Smith responded thi this would lead to a higher tax valuation and force the owners to sellsben, ownel of the land is what they want. Bennett clarified that Smith's concern was with acreage restriction. Luce responded that in terms of the streani htiffmr, vit,,,,,;....,„