Orange County NC Website
_ . .... ,.._ ..„. ,.... ,. <br /> .. . . <br /> . . .,. <br /> \ „ . . , .• • ' • F <br /> • ), . . <br /> .‘ , . • : i'.."::• ' .; r • <br /> .• ,, • • <br /> . . <br /> ) chapel Hill TownShip .AdmiSory Council <br /> . September 8, 1981 <br /> Page 3 <br /> XIr. Smith asked if all the sites There clearly defire& Luce responded that th <br /> are accurately determined through use of topographic maps. <br /> - Mr. Smith asked if University Lake and Cane Creek ware in the same watershed. <br /> Luce responded that they are ix the sane major basin, but different watersheds. <br /> " <br /> Rworraendation ig.-iv-.: <br /> .., <br /> .. . <br /> • Ince noted problems with erosion in,Chatham and Alamance C.ountie' s and the pot= <br /> . , impacts on University Lake arid' Came Ceek.wterseds xespctively. - <br /> .„ . <br /> Bennett clarified that chapel Hal was not rrenti.'onal because it does riot draisx <br /> an important 1.4teriabekl. -- <br /> Luce noted CairtorO's teiliorary 5. acre minimum in the University lake waterishe, d <br /> Recaranndation #10: , . _ <br /> 4 <br /> ... <br /> Luca noted thet..impact of intraStructime lines on davalopt type and density a <br /> the need to work with CHASA to protect the watershed. <br /> Mr. Smith as about Hillsborough's extending water along US 70. Luce noted t <br /> instances where septic tank failures required extension of parvi.ces: -Rangeuvorl <br /> ... <br /> '3. . <br /> Eland Estates. ' ' <br /> •.....- - .z.. <br /> Mr. -Smith asked about new experizental systems being used in the C.ounty. Luce <br /> responded that some were in use, but were deered impractical for the two areas - <br /> mentioned.. ' — .•: <br /> Mr.. Smith cited_Durham's use of new s3rstem. - Luce clarified that water linei has <br /> - ' <br /> been extended in, that case to address a water contamination problem. <br /> Reccragendation-#11:- . <br /> Luce indicated that zoning was the major tool for implerenting,these reconne.nda- <br /> . <br /> and policies'. He noted 'that` zoning had i..34u.i-recently.extended to Hii isbatoujh.i <br /> Bingham Townships.;and.that the Corrmi.ssionsars,-had set a-public_hearing for-Oct <br /> -:-- - for zoning-extenSidet5-,:".the' 61.-EiieV-7-C:iraieeks'..V6.-afgir§:- .H.E3 ncitha -th:*---t.ci,.tail <br /> Force had p.roposedithe-extension 'of-zap- _irig of Mase-portion- s of Cheek S" 'and CediJ <br /> . ..... . <br /> ' Grove ilbwriships toAainixt. g•designated watersheds, but the Cornnissice'-ers wz....re <br /> proposing extenslon to all of Cheeks Tcremship. <br /> Reccittrandation #12: <br /> LucaAsk=1.1 4-1-.m. ,....i....-...... 4_- .....•_,, .._t__ _1,....___,_,....____, ..,...._... -. <br />