Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-17-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 03-17-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 1:51:45 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 3:17:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/1982
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820317
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapel Hill, tbsmship Advisory Council <br /> • <br /> September 8, 1983. - <br /> age 2 - <br /> P <br /> Gover ments (a regional planning body) and the Soil Co nsercrat ri 'Service, <br /> Dr. Bennett asked bow capacity is detemnined. Luce responded w that in some cas <br /> capacity figures es prri/id d and for of ers In used a relatively v.ly ac ci tee <br /> capacity rreasurement method Used by the U.S. Geological. Survey. He..lle..added. that <br /> his figures were checked by the State Water Resou.rces Department. . <br /> Irvin noted that often a conflict of objectives ocoirs. Tr► pa± cul r b Oited <br /> the Agricultural. Task For Report's entbasis on prize agr icRa].tnlral land-pro- <br /> tection. He noted that scirre of- the best agricultural land lay along the strew <br /> valleys where the pacoposed Cane Creek l r-voir is to be located. Ha added the <br /> the yield of m flk per acre for this area compares with Stein. fL expressei <br /> • concern that in the last ten years.20% of the County's agricultu at land bad <br /> been converted and an even greater..percentage•had been caonverted- in Chatham Co <br /> due to the ,Tordari Reservoir. lie indicated that difficulty' in resolving this cc <br /> Eliot concerned which need was greataer;agr3,c.:ultural land protection or water .. <br /> quality.and supply Dian_ <br /> Dirs. Irvin noted that currant conservation rceasures here inadequate given the <br /> amount of wager wastage. Luce responded that this concern was addressed in a I <br /> recorrrendation. <br /> :bird:. Irvin also'cited the California zetfly crisis as indicative of the crit'ica <br /> -importance of protecting agricultural areas. <br /> r cation 05 , . <br /> No =rent. • = <br /> Becarmendation #6: <br /> Dr. Bennett inquired as to the largest sources of-wat er wastage. Duce.identifie <br /> pure water wastage in activities such as lawn watering. Bennett asked if these <br /> real Zy constitutes waste_, Luce responded that it would be waste in a water shim <br /> situation-%%- He-added:,that:recent building code revisions require low flow rreasw <br /> in new homes. Bennett cited'waste from leak? faucets. Luce. cited the mal4nitu <br /> of waste from system-leaks, adding that CS claims they have minimized such <br /> losses: <br /> de et ion•program. Bennett also noted potenti al. pollution pmt vn ge w <br /> Luce indicated that the remaining recomanendations concerned water quality. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.